636 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16619425)
1. Is ethics for sale?... Juggling law and ethics in managed care.
McKoy JM; Karsjens KL; Wynia M; MacDonald-Glenn L
DePaul J Health Care Law; 2005; 8(3):559-613. PubMed ID: 16619425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The two faces of gag provisions: patients and physicians in a bind.
Brand GS; Munoz GM; Nichols MG; Okata MU; Pitt JB; Seager S
Yale Law Policy Rev; 1998; 17():249-80. PubMed ID: 16437824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The brief life of the gag clause: why anti-gag clause legislation isn't enough.
Krause JH
Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 67(1):1-44. PubMed ID: 16485367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bargaining with Hippocrates: managed care and the doctor-patient relationship.
Hall TS
S C Law Rev; 2003; 54(3):689-740. PubMed ID: 15214354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Physician gag clauses--the hypocrisy of the Hippocratic Oath.
Swanson DS
South Ill Univ Law J; 1997; 21():313-34. PubMed ID: 16086489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. What recourse? Liability for managed-care decisions and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Mariner WK
N Engl J Med; 2000 Aug; 343(8):592-6. PubMed ID: 10954770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The 2007 session of the General Assembly with a compendium of Maryland insurance law.
Littman B
Md Med; 2007; 8(2):18-30. PubMed ID: 17695367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Supreme Court's limitation of managed-care liability.
Mariner WK
N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1347-52. PubMed ID: 15385665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient advocacy and termination from managed care organizations. Do state laws protecting health care professional advocacy make any difference?
Fentiman LC
Neb Law Rev; 2003; 82(2):508-74. PubMed ID: 16514765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Physician liability and managed care: a philosophical perspective.
Fine DK
Ga State Univ Law Rev; 2003; 19(3):641-703. PubMed ID: 15214340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. APA resource document: II. Regulatory guidelines for protecting the interests of psychiatric patients in emerging health care systems.
Hoge SK
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(3):407-18. PubMed ID: 8889139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Supreme Court and managed-care liability.
Erb CT; Rich RF
N Engl J Med; 2005 Jan; 352(2):201-3; author reply 201-3. PubMed ID: 15647587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Applying fiduciary responsibilities in the managed care context.
Jacobson PD; Cahill MT
Am J Law Med; 2000; 26(2-3):155-73. PubMed ID: 10953769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comments on the AMA report "Ethical issues in managed care".
Miles SH; Koepp R
J Clin Ethics; 1995; 6(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 8750588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Managed care liability and ERISA preemption.
Rakich JS; Ledbetter RK
Manag Care Q; 2000; 8(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 11009731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comments on the ethics of managed health care.
Brewer AP
Cumberland Law Rev; 1997-1998; 28(2):315-9. PubMed ID: 16437780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Back to the '90s--the Supreme Court immunizes managed care.
Bloche MG
N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1277-9. PubMed ID: 15385651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Managed care's Crimea: medical necessity, therapeutic benefit, and the goals of administrative process in health insurance.
Sage WM
Duke Law J; 2003 Nov; 53(2):597-651. PubMed ID: 15241875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A response to "Comments on the AMA report 'ethical issues in managed care'".
Plows CW
J Clin Ethics; 1995; 6(4):318-9. PubMed ID: 8750590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Can managed care be managed? Some agnostic reflections.
Kapp MB
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1998; 61(2):15-7. PubMed ID: 9637869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
