BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16619463)

  • 1. Conscience, regulation and scientific misconduct.
    Lumley J
    Res Publica; 1994; 3(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 16619463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the oversight of scientific misconduct.
    Redman BK; Merz JF
    Account Res; 2005; 12(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 16634167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The demise of the social contract for science: misconduct in science and the nonmodern world.
    Guston DH
    Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):215-48. PubMed ID: 11656758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research universities and scientific misconduct -- history, policies, and the future.
    Steneck NH
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):310-30. PubMed ID: 11653367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regulation of scientific misconduct in federally funded research.
    Steinberg NA
    South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 2000; 10(1):39-105. PubMed ID: 12953675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A social control perspective on scientific misconduct.
    Hackett EJ
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):242-60. PubMed ID: 11653363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Glory days or the lure of scientific misconduct.
    Knoll E
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 11653392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. HHS proposes revised regulations on misconduct in research.
    Shalev M
    Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Jun; 33(6):12-3. PubMed ID: 15179427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Honesty and method.
    Schmaus W
    Account Res; 1990 Oct; 1(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 15991410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Research misconduct and crime lessons from criminal science on preventing misconduct and promoting integrity.
    Adams D; Pimple KD
    Account Res; 2005; 12(3):225-40. PubMed ID: 16634173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The discipline of science: law or profession?
    Davis M
    Account Res; 1990 Oct; 1(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 15991409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Committee planned to weigh misconduct in Australia.
    Grose S
    Nat Med; 2010 Jun; 16(6):620. PubMed ID: 20526302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fraud in medical research.
    Lock S
    Issues Med Ethics; 1997; 5(4):112-4. PubMed ID: 16267905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Managing research misconduct: is anyone getting it right?
    Tavare A
    BMJ; 2011 Dec; 343():d8212. PubMed ID: 22207043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retracted paper rattles Korean science.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2009 Apr; 458(7238):561. PubMed ID: 19340046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scientific misconduct.
    Masters KJ
    JAMA; 1993 Jun 23-30; 269(24):3105; author reply 3105-6. PubMed ID: 8505807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Commentary on the allegation of scientific misconduct charge against Bucci et al.
    Colagiovanni D
    Reprod Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 22(3):554; author reply 555. PubMed ID: 16621442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The response to an allegation of scientific misconduct in the Bucci et al. article on DIMP exposure in mink.
    Calonge N
    Reprod Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 22(3):553; author reply 555. PubMed ID: 16677800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fraudian analysis.
    Greenberg DS
    New Sci; 1982 Sep; 95(1321):643. PubMed ID: 11655502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Call for arm's-length national research integrity agency.
    Kondro W
    CMAJ; 2007 Mar; 176(6):749-50. PubMed ID: 17353518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.