147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16619463)
21. [Once again about certain ethical principles of science and research].
Tsimmerman IaS
Klin Med (Mosk); 2009; 87(2):4-7. PubMed ID: 19348291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Expressing a consensus on candour.
Guenin LM
Nature; 1999 Dec; 402(6762):577-8. PubMed ID: 10604459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Science with health consequences.
Cranor CF
Int J Occup Environ Health; 2006; 12(2):177-9. PubMed ID: 16722198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. German task force outraged by changes to science fraud report.
Schiermeier Q
Nature; 2002 Jan; 415(6867):3. PubMed ID: 11780073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. We deserve a government that respects scientific integrity.
Russell E
CMAJ; 2015 Oct; 187(15):1107. PubMed ID: 26391718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Stop misbehaving!
Neill US
J Clin Invest; 2006 Jul; 116(7):1740-1. PubMed ID: 16823470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Managing allegations of research misconduct.
Hey E
J R Soc Med; 2009 Apr; 102(4):134-8. PubMed ID: 19349504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Draft legislation: the Science Research Protection Act of 1990.
Shader RI; Greenblatt DJ
J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1990 Dec; 10(6):387-8. PubMed ID: 2286707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Scientific misconduct--does it exist?
Böttiger LE
J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 8308471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Management of research misconduct--in practice.
Wells FO
J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 8308473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Shattuck Lecture--misconduct in medical research.
Delaney M
N Engl J Med; 1993 Sep; 329(10):734. PubMed ID: 8345873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Research misconduct in the UK.
Godlee F; Wager E
BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d8357. PubMed ID: 22218103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Freedom and responsibility.
Breithaupt H
EMBO Rep; 2011 Jul; 12(8):744. PubMed ID: 21799525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. An unwelcome discovery. Walter DeNino was a young lab technician who analyzed data for his mentor, Eric Poehlman. What he found was that Poehlman was not the scientist he appeared to be.
Interlandi J
N Y Times Mag; 2006 Oct; ():98-103. PubMed ID: 17115505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The unending saga of legal controls over scientific misconduct: a clash of cultures needing resolution.
Goldner JA
Am J Law Med; 1998; 24(2-3):293-343. PubMed ID: 9702276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. UK must learn from US's mistakes in tackling research misconduct.
Dyer C
BMJ; 2007 May; 334(7602):1027. PubMed ID: 17510135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Our stated ethical policy.
Cryo Letters; 2005; 26(5):277-8. PubMed ID: 19827242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Scientific misconduct: Dingell tries again.
Anderson GC
Nature; 1990 May; 345(6272):195. PubMed ID: 2333093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Science, fraud and the Baltimore case.
Bernstein J
Commentary; 1998 Dec; 106(6):40-4. PubMed ID: 15986525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. A case of scientific misconduct: the cost of bad science.
Broome ME
Clin Nurse Spec; 2009; 23(5):268. PubMed ID: 19710574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
