These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16619463)

  • 41. [Scientific misconduct, mistakes or something in between?].
    Levi R
    Lakartidningen; 2006 Apr 12-25; 103(15-16):1203-5. PubMed ID: 16696201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. University clears scientist of misconduct but says his conduct was misbehaviour.
    Parry J
    BMJ; 2006 Feb; 332(7538):382. PubMed ID: 16484251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Shattuck Lecture--misconduct in medical research.
    Onek JN
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Sep; 329(10):733-4. PubMed ID: 8345872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [New guidelines on good scientific practice].
    Nielsen OH
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 May; 171(22):1847-9. PubMed ID: 19486614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Enhancing research integrity.
    Richman VV; Richman A
    CMAJ; 2007 Aug; 177(4):375. PubMed ID: 17698830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Misconduct? It's all academic..
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):240-1. PubMed ID: 17230159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reported inaccuracies about the UK Research Integrity Office.
    Parry J
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():e547. PubMed ID: 22275414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The REF and UK academic medicine.
    Fogarty DG
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():e544. PubMed ID: 22275413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Correcting the scientific record.
    Nat Chem Biol; 2008 Jul; 4(7):381. PubMed ID: 18560424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. An allegation of scientific misconduct in the Bucci et al. article concerning the effects of DIMP on mink.
    Calabrese EJ
    Reprod Toxicol; 2005; 19(4):443-6; author reply 447-51. PubMed ID: 15749256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. More misconduct hearings.
    Science; 1990 Jan; 247(4941):404. PubMed ID: 2300802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Research collaborations: trial, trust, and truth.
    Hanawalt PC
    Cell; 2006 Sep; 126(5):823-5. PubMed ID: 16959557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Fraud in science.
    Weinstein D
    Soc Sci Q; 1979 Mar; 59(4):639-52. PubMed ID: 11662017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Research integrity on the Horizon.
    Bosch X
    Lancet; 2012 May; 379(9827):1679-80. PubMed ID: 22559884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Universities against scientific misconduct].
    Benestad HB
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Feb; 127(3):322. PubMed ID: 17279120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Australian neuroscientist given two year suspended sentence for falsifying Parkinson's research.
    Dyer O
    BMJ; 2016 Apr; 353():i2013. PubMed ID: 27055934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Abandoned fraud case too baffling for jury.
    Charles D
    New Sci; 1992 Jul; 135(1831):4. PubMed ID: 16044593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Reasons scientists avoid thinking about ethics.
    Wolpe PR
    Cell; 2006 Jun; 125(6):1023-5. PubMed ID: 16777590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Response to proposed research to reverse brain death: more than regulatory failure.
    Srinivasan S; Johari V
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2016; 1(3):134-7. PubMed ID: 27474692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Ethics in science.
    Baum BJ; Scully C
    Oral Dis; 2007 Mar; 13(2):125. PubMed ID: 17305611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.