These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16620805)

  • 1. Computerized detection of breast masses in digitized mammograms.
    Varela C; Tahoces PG; Méndez AJ; Souto M; Vidal JJ
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Feb; 37(2):214-26. PubMed ID: 16620805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer-aided diagnosis: automatic detection of malignant masses in digitized mammograms.
    Méndez AJ; Tahoces PG; Lado MJ; Souto M; Vidal JJ
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):957-64. PubMed ID: 9650186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning from mammography.
    Samala RK; Chan HP; Hadjiiski L; Helvie MA; Wei J; Cha K
    Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6654. PubMed ID: 27908154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
    Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. False-positive reduction technique for detection of masses on digital mammograms: global and local multiresolution texture analysis.
    Wei D; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
    Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):903-14. PubMed ID: 9198026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-aided mass detection in mammography: false positive reduction via gray-scale invariant ranklet texture features.
    Masotti M; Lanconelli N; Campanini R
    Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 19291970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications].
    Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Londero V; Smania S; Bottigli U; Delogu P
    Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 11438784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incorporation of an iterative, linear segmentation routine into a mammographic mass CAD system.
    Catarious DM; Baydush AH; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 15259655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computerized analysis of multiple-mammographic views: potential usefulness of special view mammograms in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Huo Z; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 11811828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated detection of breast masses on mammograms using adaptive contrast enhancement and texture classification.
    Petrick N; Chan HP; Wei D; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Adler DD
    Med Phys; 1996 Oct; 23(10):1685-96. PubMed ID: 8946366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computerized classification of malignant and benign microcalcifications on mammograms: texture analysis using an artificial neural network.
    Chan HP; Sahiner B; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Lam KL; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Mar; 42(3):549-67. PubMed ID: 9080535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined adaptive enhancement and region-growing segmentation of breast masses on digitized mammograms.
    Petrick N; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 1999 Aug; 26(8):1642-54. PubMed ID: 10501064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computerized detection of malignant tumors on digital mammograms.
    Kobatake H; Murakami M; Takeo H; Nawano S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 May; 18(5):369-78. PubMed ID: 10416798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance and reproducibility of a computerized mass detection scheme for digitized mammography using rotated and resampled images: an assessment.
    Zheng B; Maitz GS; Ganott MA; Abrams G; Leader JK; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jul; 185(1):194-8. PubMed ID: 15972422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiresolution local binary pattern texture analysis combined with variable selection for application to false-positive reduction in computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms.
    Choi JY; Ro YM
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):7029-52. PubMed ID: 23053352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography.
    Eltonsy NH; Tourassi GD; Elmaghraby AS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jun; 26(6):880-9. PubMed ID: 17679338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computerized characterization of masses on mammograms: the rubber band straightening transform and texture analysis.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM
    Med Phys; 1998 Apr; 25(4):516-26. PubMed ID: 9571620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing false positives of microcalcification detection systems by removal of breast arterial calcifications.
    Mordang JJ; Gubern-Mérida A; den Heeten G; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1676. PubMed ID: 27036566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of the iris filter for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules on computed tomography images.
    Suárez-Cuenca JJ; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Lado MJ; Remy-Jardin M; Remy J; Vidal JJ
    Comput Biol Med; 2009 Oct; 39(10):921-33. PubMed ID: 19660744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-aided detection schemes: the effect of limiting the number of cued regions in each case.
    Zheng B; Leader JK; Abrams G; Shindel B; Catullo V; Good WF; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 14975949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.