These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16621208)

  • 41. Facial frontal morphological changes related to mandibular setback osteotomy using cephalograms.
    Amano K; Yagi T; Iida S; Aikawa T; Yamashiro T; Takada K; Kogo M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 37(7):412-6. PubMed ID: 19482484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Modification of retraction technique for better visibility during mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Kini Y; Halli R; Bither S
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Dec; 45(8):688. PubMed ID: 17512644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Massive hemorrhage following bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a case report.
    Oh JS; Kim SG; Kim HK; Moon SY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):895-8. PubMed ID: 19304053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An ergonomic and effective parotid retractor.
    Grew NR; Whear NM
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Dec; 39(6):448-9. PubMed ID: 11735140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. New retractor for increasing visibility and reducing operating time of intraoral vertical oblique osteotomy.
    Petri WH
    Mil Med; 1984 Jan; 149(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 6422329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [What is Piezosurgery? Two-years experience in craniomaxillofacial surgery].
    Beziat JL; Vercellotti T; Gleizal A
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2007 Apr; 108(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 17360013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Changes in occlusal force after mandibular ramus osteotomy with and without Le Fort I osteotomy.
    Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 36(4):301-4. PubMed ID: 17239561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Neurosensory disturbances one year after bilateral sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy performed with separators.
    Borstlap WA; Stoelinga PJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 37(3):182. PubMed ID: 19138861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Skeletal stability after simultaneous mandibular angle resection and sagittal split ramus osteotomy for correction of mandible prognathism.
    Kim CH; Lee JH; Cho JY; Lee JH; Kim KW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Feb; 65(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 17236920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Ultrasonic osteotomy in oral surgery and implantology.
    González-García A; Diniz-Freitas M; Somoza-Martín M; García-García A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):360-7. PubMed ID: 19570693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Modified Dingman mouth retractor.
    Özdemir A; Karaaltin MV; Güneren E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):347. PubMed ID: 22337444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A simple and accurate method for mounting models in orthognathic surgery.
    Wolford LM; Galiano A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 65(7):1406-9. PubMed ID: 17577514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A new evaluation method for neurosensory disturbance in the chin of patients undergoing mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an application of the heat flux technique.
    Kabasawa Y; Harada K; Jinno S; Satoh Y; Maruoka Y; Omura K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Dec; 102(6):719-24. PubMed ID: 17138171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Atraumatic percutaneous transfer of an externally ported distractor activation arm.
    Patterson AR; Brady G; Loukota RA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Aug; 66(8):1748-9. PubMed ID: 18634969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A comparison of lower lip hypoesthesia measured by trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potential between different types of mandibular osteotomies and fixation.
    Hashiba Y; Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Yoshida K; Shimizu C; Alam S; Nakagawa K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Aug; 104(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 17448708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Analysis of 40 cases of intraoral verticosagittal ramus osteotomies to treat dentofacial deformities.
    Lima Júnior SM; Granato R; Marin C; de Souza Maliska MC; Gil JN
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 67(9):1840-3. PubMed ID: 19686919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The use of osteotomes in dental implant surgery.
    Flanagan D
    Dent Today; 2006 Apr; 25(4):68-72. PubMed ID: 16646507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Analysis of clinical usefulness of the heat flux technique: predictability of the recovery from neurosensory disturbances in the chin undergoing mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Satoh Y; Kabasawa Y; Jinno S; Omura K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):637-43. PubMed ID: 18602311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
    Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Neurosensory alteration in the lower lip and chin area after orthognathic surgery: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus inverted L ramus osteotomy.
    Kobayashi A; Yoshimasu H; Kobayashi J; Amagasa T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 May; 64(5):778-84. PubMed ID: 16631484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.