These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16621246)

  • 41. Analytical methods for waste minimisation in the convenience food industry.
    Darlington R; Staikos T; Rahimifard S
    Waste Manag; 2009 Apr; 29(4):1274-81. PubMed ID: 19019669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An assessment of bioreactor landfill costs and benefits.
    Berge ND; Reinhart DR; Batarseh ES
    Waste Manag; 2009 May; 29(5):1558-67. PubMed ID: 19167875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Assessment for the management of NORM wastes in conventional hazardous and nonhazardous waste landfills.
    Mora JC; Baeza A; Robles B; Sanz J
    J Hazard Mater; 2016 Jun; 310():161-9. PubMed ID: 26921509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Assessing the market opportunities of landfill mining.
    van der Zee DJ; Achterkamp MC; de Visser BJ
    Waste Manag; 2004; 24(8):795-804. PubMed ID: 15381231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Long-term oxygen depletion from infiltrating groundwaters: model development and application to intra-glaciation and glaciation conditions.
    Sidborn M; Neretnieks I
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Aug; 100(1-2):72-89. PubMed ID: 18644316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Natural releases from contaminated groundwater, Example Reference Biosphere 2B.
    Simón I; Naito M; Thorne MC; Walke R
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 84(2):171-84. PubMed ID: 15985320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A comparative radiological assessment of five European biosphere systems in the context of potential contamination of well water from the hypothetical disposal of radioactive waste.
    Olyslaegers G; Zeevaert T; Pinedo P; Simon I; Pröhl G; Kowe R; Chen Q; Mobbs S; Bergström U; Hallberg B; Katona T; Eged K; Kanyar B
    J Radiol Prot; 2005 Dec; 25(4):375-91. PubMed ID: 16340067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Spatial and multi-criteria decision analysis-based methodology for landfill site selection in growing urban regions.
    Ersoy H; Bulut F
    Waste Manag Res; 2009 Aug; 27(5):489-500. PubMed ID: 19423606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Multi-regime transport model for leaching behavior of heterogeneous porous materials.
    Sanchez F; Massry IW; Eighmy T; Kosson DS
    Waste Manag; 2003; 23(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 12737964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Characterizing the paper industry sludge for environmentally-safe disposal.
    de Azevedo ARG; Alexandre J; Pessanha LSP; Manhães RDST; de Brito J; Marvila MT
    Waste Manag; 2019 Jul; 95():43-52. PubMed ID: 31351628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Risk assessment of landfill disposal sites--State of the art.
    Butt TE; Lockley E; Oduyemi KO
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(6):952-64. PubMed ID: 17977707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Radioactive waste management in France: safety demonstration fundamentals.
    Ouzounian G; Voinis S; Boissier F
    Ann ICRP; 2012; 41(3-4):286-93. PubMed ID: 23089028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Critical analysis of the waste management performance of two uranium production units in Brazil--part I: Poços de Caldas production centre.
    Fernandes HM; Franklin MR; Gomiero LA
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Apr; 87(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 17566635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Test method selection, validation against field data, and predictive modelling for impact evaluation of stabilised waste disposal.
    van der Sloot HA; van Zomeren A; Meeussen JC; Seignette P; Bleijerveld R
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Mar; 141(2):354-69. PubMed ID: 16889893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. An environmentally viable waste disposal method for oil-producing countries.
    ud din S; Reza Oskui GP; Al-Dousari A; Al Ghadban AN; Al Murad M
    Waste Manag Res; 2010 Feb; 28(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 19748946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [The problem of special, toxic, and hazardous wastes].
    Leoni V; Grella A
    Nuovi Ann Ig Microbiol; 1988; 39(4-5):515-20. PubMed ID: 3151122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Reducing acid leaching of manganiferous ore: effect of the iron removal operation on solid waste disposal.
    De Michelis I; Ferella F; Beolchini F; Vegliò F
    Waste Manag; 2009 Jan; 29(1):128-35. PubMed ID: 18556190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of slope stability in two Brazilian municipal landfills.
    Gharabaghi B; Singh MK; Inkratas C; Fleming IR; McBean E
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1509-17. PubMed ID: 17897819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Advances in NORM management in Norway and the application of ICRP's 2007 recommendations.
    Liland A; Strand P; Amundsen I; Natvig H; Nilsen M; Lystad R; Frogg KE
    Ann ICRP; 2012; 41(3-4):332-42. PubMed ID: 23089033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Multi-objective optimization of solid waste flows: environmentally sustainable strategies for municipalities.
    Minciardi R; Paolucci M; Robba M; Sacile R
    Waste Manag; 2008 Nov; 28(11):2202-12. PubMed ID: 18042369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.