These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16621336)

  • 1. SQAB 2005: complexity and generalizability.
    Grace RC; Marr MJ
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jun; 72(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 16621336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning in the temporal bisection task: Relative or absolute?
    de Carvalho MP; Machado A; Tonneau F
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 26752233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A model for temporal generalization and discrimination.
    Heinemann EG
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1984; 423():361-71. PubMed ID: 6588800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Scalar Expectancy Theory (SET) and the Learning-to-Time (LeT) model in a successive temporal bisection task.
    Arantes J
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):269-78. PubMed ID: 18280059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The context effect as interaction of temporal generalization gradients: testing the fundamental assumptions of the Learning-to-Time model.
    Vieira de Castro AC; Machado A; Tomanari GY
    Behav Processes; 2013 May; 95():18-30. PubMed ID: 23410903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A computer program for Spearman-Kärber and probit analysis of psychometric function data.
    Miller J; Ulrich R
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Feb; 36(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 15190695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN CHOICE TIME AND FREQUENCY DURING DISCRIMINATION TRAINING AND GENERALIZATION TESTS.
    WOLLEN KA
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Nov; 66():474-84. PubMed ID: 14082003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Context effect in a temporal bisection task with the choice keys available during the sample.
    Oliveira L; Machado A
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 19162143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Further tests of the Scalar Expectancy Theory (SET) and the Learning-to-Time (LeT) model in a temporal bisection task.
    Machado A; Arantes J
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jun; 72(3):195-206. PubMed ID: 16616993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revisiting measurement models in psychosomatic medicine research: a latent variable approach.
    Llabre MM; Fitzpatrick SL
    Psychosom Med; 2012; 74(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 22286856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiological correlates of temporal generalization: evidence for a two-process model of time perception.
    Gibbons H; Rammsayer TH
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):195-209. PubMed ID: 15975771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of temporal generalization in a temporal discrimination task.
    Russell R; Kirkpatrick K
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 16979846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal generalization gradients following an interdimensional discrimination protocol.
    Vieira de Castro AC; Vasconcelos M; Machado A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(9):1701-18. PubMed ID: 26605786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detectability and criterion measures in temporal generalization.
    Wearden JH
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):374-9. PubMed ID: 18329824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual classes established with forced-choice primary generalization tests and transfer of function.
    Reeve KF; Fields L
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jul; 76(1):95-114. PubMed ID: 11516117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contributions of learning to human development.
    Gagné RM
    Psychol Rev; 1968 May; 75(3):177-91. PubMed ID: 4874111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the development of stimulus control.
    Heinemann EG; Avin E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Sep; 20(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 4752088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scaling techniques for modeling directional knowledge.
    Waller D; Haun DB
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2003 May; 35(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 12834086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating discrimination performance in two-alternative forced choice tasks: routines for MATLAB and R.
    Bausenhart KM; Dyjas O; Vorberg D; Ulrich R
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):1157-74. PubMed ID: 22773433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SQAB 2008: more than the usual suspects.
    Reid AK; Shahan TA; Grace RC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 19429210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.