136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16621442)
1. Commentary on the allegation of scientific misconduct charge against Bucci et al.
Colagiovanni D
Reprod Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 22(3):554; author reply 555. PubMed ID: 16621442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The response to an allegation of scientific misconduct in the Bucci et al. article on DIMP exposure in mink.
Calonge N
Reprod Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 22(3):553; author reply 555. PubMed ID: 16677800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An allegation of scientific misconduct in the Bucci et al. article concerning the effects of DIMP on mink.
Calabrese EJ
Reprod Toxicol; 2005; 19(4):443-6; author reply 447-51. PubMed ID: 15749256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Scientific misconduct, mistakes or something in between?].
Levi R
Lakartidningen; 2006 Apr 12-25; 103(15-16):1203-5. PubMed ID: 16696201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A Statement on Ethics From the HEART Group.
HEART Group
Circ Res; 2008 May; 102(9):e104-5. PubMed ID: 18467635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Promoting ethical conduct in the publication of research.
Freedman JE
Cardiovasc Ther; 2008; 26(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 18485131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Tattered threads.
Shafer SL
Anesth Analg; 2009 May; 108(5):1361-3. PubMed ID: 19372305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A statement on ethics from the HEART group.
HEART Group
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 May; 71(6):859-61. PubMed ID: 18412086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Research collaborations: trial, trust, and truth.
Hanawalt PC
Cell; 2006 Sep; 126(5):823-5. PubMed ID: 16959557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. HHS proposes revised regulations on misconduct in research.
Shalev M
Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Jun; 33(6):12-3. PubMed ID: 15179427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fraud in medical research.
Lock S
Issues Med Ethics; 1997; 5(4):112-4. PubMed ID: 16267905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Are Impact Factors corrupting truth and utility in biomedical research?
Suhrbier A; Poland GA
Vaccine; 2013 Dec; 31(51):6041-2. PubMed ID: 24184289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Conscience, regulation and scientific misconduct.
Lumley J
Res Publica; 1994; 3(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 16619463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Scientific misconduct. Government sanctions Harvard psychologist.
Carpenter S
Science; 2012 Sep; 337(6100):1283. PubMed ID: 22984041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of diisopropylmethylphosphonate, a by-product of the production of sarin and a contaminant in drinking water at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal, on female mink.
Calabrese EJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2003 Apr; 37(2):191-201. PubMed ID: 12726753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific misconduct, stem cells, and the way ahead.
Lindblad WJ
Wound Repair Regen; 2006; 14(2):101. PubMed ID: 16630096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [To find out or to think of--the little difference].
Haug C
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(3):293. PubMed ID: 16440029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Research quality and integrity.
Smith AJ
Prim Dent Care; 2008 Apr; 15(2):44; author reply 44. PubMed ID: 18397590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. ESH statement on detection and punishment of abstract fraud and poster plagiarism.
Kjeldsen SE; Narkiewicz K; Cifková R; Mancia G
Blood Press; 2005; 14(6):322-3. PubMed ID: 16403685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Journals should set a new standard in transparency.
Dellavalle RP; Lundahl K; Freeman SR; Schilling LM
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7126):364. PubMed ID: 17251958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
