These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16621442)

  • 41. . . . et alii, et aliae, et alia, et cetera ... Rights and responsibilities of authorship.
    Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):139-40. PubMed ID: 16876046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [New guidelines on good scientific practice].
    Nielsen OH
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 May; 171(22):1847-9. PubMed ID: 19486614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Our stated ethical policy.
    Cryo Letters; 2005; 26(5):277-8. PubMed ID: 19827242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Human cloning and scientific corruption: the South Korea scandal and the future of the stem cell debate.
    New Atlantis; 2006; 11():113-7. PubMed ID: 16789313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Proceedings of TCT: TCT Keynote Speaker Addresses conflict of interest.
    J Interv Cardiol; 2007 Apr; 20(2):171-2. PubMed ID: 17391228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Academic integrity and research misconduct in medical research field].
    Wang J; Jin X
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Apr; 94(12):881-3. PubMed ID: 24854904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Commentary: stem cell research continues in Korea beyond the Hwang scandal.
    Kim KS
    Stem Cells; 2007 May; 25(5):1336. PubMed ID: 17272494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A statement on ethics from the HEART Group.
    Eur Heart J; 2008 May; 29(9):1093-5. PubMed ID: 18450767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Retracted paper rattles Korean science.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2009 Apr; 458(7238):561. PubMed ID: 19340046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Research ethics.
    Shahan JB; Kelen GD
    Emerg Med Clin North Am; 2006 Aug; 24(3):657-69. PubMed ID: 16877135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Lessons learned from independent central review.
    Ford R; Schwartz L; Dancey J; Dodd LE; Eisenhauer EA; Gwyther S; Rubinstein L; Sargent D; Shankar L; Therasse P; Verweij J
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jan; 45(2):268-74. PubMed ID: 19101138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Perioperative analgesia: what do we still know?
    White PF; Kehlet H; Liu S
    Anesth Analg; 2009 May; 108(5):1364-7. PubMed ID: 19372306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Miracle postponed.
    Aldhous P
    New Sci; 2006 Mar 11-17; 189(2542):38-41. PubMed ID: 16789320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Peer review and fraud.
    Nature; 2006 Dec; 444(7122):971-2. PubMed ID: 17183274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Scientific misconduct in Norwegian medical research].
    Bratlid D
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(13):1795-6. PubMed ID: 17599131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. PhD students' awareness of research misconduct.
    Boskovic M; Djokovic J; Grubor I; Guzvic V; Jakovljevic B; Jurisevic M; Ljubisic D; Mijajlovic M; Milicevic I; Milovanovic M; Nikolic L; Nikolic M; Peric S; Petrovic A; Petrovic J; Radonjic K; Simonovic L; Simovic M; Stojanovic S; Stojic I; Tomovic J; Vranic S; Vucicevic K; Zdravkovic A; Jankovic S
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2013 Apr; 8(2):163-4. PubMed ID: 23651941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Looking back at the 1987 Cervical Cancer Inquiry.
    Williams L
    N Z Med J; 2004 Sep; 117(1202):U1084; author reply U1084. PubMed ID: 15477915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [From the Cochrane Library: the use of peer review is still under discussion].
    Stijntjes F; Veeken H
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(16):934-7. PubMed ID: 18561790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Peer review of research institutions. Evaluation or facilitation].
    Almind G
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jan; 165(4):327-9. PubMed ID: 12599794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Peer review: the best of the blemished?
    Alpert JS
    Am J Med; 2007 Apr; 120(4):287-8. PubMed ID: 17398217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.