264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16622142)
1. Second-order peer review of the medical literature for clinical practitioners.
Haynes RB; Cotoi C; Holland J; Walters L; Wilczynski N; Jedraszewski D; McKinlay J; Parrish R; McKibbon KA;
JAMA; 2006 Apr; 295(15):1801-8. PubMed ID: 16622142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic reviews and original articles differ in relevance, novelty, and use in an evidence-based service for physicians: PLUS project.
McKinlay RJ; Cotoi C; Wilczynski NL; Haynes RB
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 May; 61(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 18394537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Defining the publication source of high-quality evidence in urology: an analysis of EvidenceUpdates.
Narayan VM; Chrouser K; Haynes RB; Parrish R; Dahm P
BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 26663761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What do evidence-based secondary journals tell us about the publication of clinically important articles in primary healthcare journals?
McKibbon KA; Wilczynski NL; Haynes RB
BMC Med; 2004 Sep; 2():33. PubMed ID: 15350200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evidence rating service provided valid correlates of the clinical importance of medical articles and journals.
Haynes RB; Budhram D; Cherian J; Iserman E; Iorio A; Lokker C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 May; 109():80-89. PubMed ID: 30731116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of review articles published in peer-reviewed and throwaway journals.
Rochon PA; Bero LA; Bay AM; Gold JL; Dergal JM; Binns MA; Streiner DL; Gurwitz JH
JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2853-6. PubMed ID: 12038932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Which journals do primary care physicians and specialists access from an online service?
McKibbon KA; Haynes RB; McKinlay RJ; Lokker C
J Med Libr Assoc; 2007 Jul; 95(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 17641754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A method for defining a journal subset for a clinical discipline using the bibliographies of systematic reviews.
Wilczynski NL; Garg AX; Haynes B;
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 1):721-4. PubMed ID: 17911811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. McMaster Premium Literature Service (PLUS): an evidence-based medicine information service delivered on the Web.
Holland J; Haynes RB;
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():340-4. PubMed ID: 16779058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trend analysis of disaster health articles in peer-reviewed publications pre- and post-9/11.
Kelen G; Sauer LM
Am J Disaster Med; 2008; 3(6):369-76. PubMed ID: 19202890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Publication times, impact factors, and advance online publication in ophthalmology journals.
Chen H; Chen CH; Jhanji V
Ophthalmology; 2013 Aug; 120(8):1697-701. PubMed ID: 23623355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde.
Pierie JP; Walvoort HC; Overbeke AJ
Lancet; 1996 Nov; 348(9040):1480-3. PubMed ID: 8942777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. McMaster PLUS: a cluster randomized clinical trial of an intervention to accelerate clinical use of evidence-based information from digital libraries.
Haynes RB; Holland J; Cotoi C; McKinlay RJ; Wilczynski NL; Walters LA; Jedras D; Parrish R; McKibbon KA; Garg A; Walter SD
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2006; 13(6):593-600. PubMed ID: 16929034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.
Jones AW
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jan; 165(2-3):115-28. PubMed ID: 16784827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How much effort is needed to keep up with the literature relevant for primary care?
Alper BS; Hand JA; Elliott SG; Kinkade S; Hauan MJ; Onion DK; Sklar BM
J Med Libr Assoc; 2004 Oct; 92(4):429-37. PubMed ID: 15494758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Funding and publishing trends of original research by emergency medicine investigators over the past decade.
Birkhahn RH; Van Deusen SK; Okpara OI; Datillo PA; Briggs WM; Gaeta TJ
Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Jan; 13(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 16365335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Consensus conference follow-up: inter-rater reliability assessment of the Best Evidence in Emergency Medicine (BEEM) rater scale, a medical literature rating tool for emergency physicians.
Worster A; Kulasegaram K; Carpenter CR; Vallera T; Upadhye S; Sherbino J; Haynes RB
Acad Emerg Med; 2011 Nov; 18(11):1193-200. PubMed ID: 22092904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of the World Wide Web by medical journals in 2003 and 2005: an observational study.
Schriger DL; Ouk S; Altman DG
Pediatrics; 2007 Jan; 119(1):e53-60. PubMed ID: 17200258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility of hospital-based use of peer ratings to evaluate the performances of practicing physicians.
Ramsey PG; Carline JD; Blank LL; Wenrich MD
Acad Med; 1996 Apr; 71(4):364-70. PubMed ID: 8645402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
