These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16622530)
41. Can't Get No Reproduction: Leading Researchers Discuss the Problem of Irreproducible Results. Williams R Circ Res; 2015 Sep; 117(8):667-70. PubMed ID: 26405184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Bibliometric indexes, databases and impact factors in cardiology. Bienert IR; Oliveira RC; Andrade PB; Caramori CA Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc; 2015; 30(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 26107458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. New perspectives in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias and their application in Brazil. Scanavacca M Arq Bras Cardiol; 2012 Dec; 99(6):1071-4. PubMed ID: 23337986 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Evaluating the merit of research in clinical cardiology: from citation to declaration. Dolara A J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2015 Jul; 16(7):525-6. PubMed ID: 26017765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Guidelines for reporting of statistics in European Urology. Vickers AJ; Sjoberg DD; Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 25037638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Top 50 Most-Cited Journal of Clinical Oncology Articles From 2014. J Clin Oncol; 2018 Apr; 36(11):1170-1172. PubMed ID: 29481296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Cardiology in Brazilian scientific journals: an overview. Patel KK; Rocha e Silva M Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc; 2012; 27(2):302-11. PubMed ID: 22996983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Statistics: all together now, one step at a time. Drummond GB; Paterson DJ; McLoughlin P; McGrath JC J Physiol; 2011 Apr; 589(Pt 8):1859. PubMed ID: 21498377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. The scientific production of Brazilian neurologists: 1995-2004. Nitrini R Arq Neuropsiquiatr; 2006 Jun; 64(2B):538-42. PubMed ID: 16917636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? Steen RG J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Between fetishism and survival: are scientific articles a form of academic merchandise?]. Castiel LD; Sanz-Valero J Cad Saude Publica; 2007 Dec; 23(12):3041-50. PubMed ID: 18157347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Scientist-friendly policies for non-native English-speaking authors: timely and welcome. Vasconcelos SM; Sorenson MM; Leta J Braz J Med Biol Res; 2007 Jun; 40(6):743-7. PubMed ID: 17581671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The impact of ophthalmology. Duffel PG; Weingeist TA Ophthalmology; 2009 Aug; 116(8):1423-4. PubMed ID: 19651309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Massive citations to misleading methods and research tools: Matthew effect, quotation error and citation copying. Ioannidis JPA Eur J Epidemiol; 2018 Nov; 33(11):1021-1023. PubMed ID: 30291530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Global trend in breast cancer imaging research 1992-2012: bibliometric study. Ha R; Chow D; Wynn R AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):696-7. PubMed ID: 24555610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Editorial: 10 most accessed and the 10 most cited papers. Borchardt RT J Pharm Sci; 2015 Apr; 104(4):1211-2. PubMed ID: 25754588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]