BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16622959)

  • 1. In re E.G., a Minor: death over life: a judicial trend continues as the Illinois Supreme Court grants minors the right to refuse life-saving medical treatment.
    Brewster WD
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):771-86. PubMed ID: 16622959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. My God my choice: the mature minor doctrine and adolescent refusal of life-saving or sustaining medical treatment based upon religious beliefs.
    Will JF
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2006; 22(2):233-300. PubMed ID: 17117699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recognizing the right of terminally-ill mature minors to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment: the need for legislative guidelines to give full effect to minors' expanded rights.
    Lonowski SC
    Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1995-1996 Spring; 34(2):421-45. PubMed ID: 11654443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Praying for relief from parens patriae: should a child be allowed to refuse life-saving medical treatment on religious grounds?
    Kessler DN
    Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):673-93. PubMed ID: 11650888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In the Interest of E.G.
    Illinois. Appellate Court, First District, Third Division
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1987 Sep; 515():286-98. PubMed ID: 12041201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The right to refuse treatment and blood transfusion.
    Csapody T
    Bull Med Ethics; 2001 Feb; (165):13-6. PubMed ID: 11831259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The maternal-fetal rights dilemma: honoring a woman's choice of medical care during pregnancy.
    Arch RR
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):637-73. PubMed ID: 8666737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In re E.G.
    Illinois. Supreme Court
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1989 Nov; 549():322-31. PubMed ID: 12041191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The competent child's preference in clinical medical decisions: a proposal for its consideration.
    Mark LB
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1983; 11(1):25-58. PubMed ID: 16086470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In re Dubreuil: is an individual's right to refuse a blood transfusion contingent on parental status?
    Bamonte JL; Bierman C
    Nova Law Rev; 1992; 17(1):517-47. PubMed ID: 11659589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acknowledging the hypocrisy: granting minors the right to choose their medical treatment.
    Hanisco CM
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 2000; 16(3):899-932. PubMed ID: 12645594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Consent of Jehovah's Witnesses to treatment with blood preparations: legal and ethical aspects].
    Zaba C; Swiderski P; Zaba Z; Klimberg A; Przybylski Z
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(1):138-43. PubMed ID: 17571519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In re E.G., a minor.
    Salyer DR
    Issues Law Med; 1991; 6(4):421-4. PubMed ID: 2037462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Freedom of religion versus civil authority in matters of health.
    Flowers RB
    Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci; 1979 Nov; 446():149-61. PubMed ID: 11651749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minors and refusal of treatment: who decides in the best interests of the child?
    Starr L
    Aust Nurs J; 2012 Jul; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 22978001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ENT surgery, blood and Jehovah's Witnesses.
    Woolley SL; Smith DR
    J Laryngol Otol; 2007 May; 121(5):409-14. PubMed ID: 17125571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses and the patient's right to self-determination.
    Ariga T
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2009 Apr; 11 Suppl 1():S138-40. PubMed ID: 19272827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The potential right of chronically ill adolescents to refuse life-saving medical treatment--fatal misuse of mature minor doctrine.
    Penkower JA
    De Paul Law Rev; 1996; 45(4):1165-216. PubMed ID: 16977737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Norwood Hospital v. Munoz.
    Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Norfolk
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1991 Jan; 564():1017-26. PubMed ID: 12041202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.