265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16622987)
1. More subject and less human: the pain-filled journey of human subjects protection ... and some differences in the United States and the European Union.
Gillon JJ
Med Law Int; 2005; 7(1):65-89. PubMed ID: 16622987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fifty years later: the significance of the Nuremberg Code.
Shuster E
N Engl J Med; 1997 Nov; 337(20):1436-40. PubMed ID: 9358142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Divergent standards for consent in research.
Nicholson R
Bull Med Ethics; 2003 Dec-2004 Jan; (194):13-21. PubMed ID: 15832471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Beyond Nazi War Crimes Experiments: The Voluntary Consent Requirement of the Nuremberg Code at 70.
Annas GJ
Am J Public Health; 2018 Jan; 108(1):42-46. PubMed ID: 29161060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Regulation of medical research--why and how].
Simonsen S; Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2004 Aug; 124(16):2133-6. PubMed ID: 15334134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg Trial. A reappraisal.
Katz J
JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(20):1662-6. PubMed ID: 8922453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An overview of legal controls on human experimentation and the regulatory implications of taking Professor Katz seriously.
Goldner JA
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):63-134. PubMed ID: 11656325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent in human experimentation before the Nuremberg code.
Vollmann J; Winau R
BMJ; 1996 Dec; 313(7070):1445-9. PubMed ID: 8973233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reform of Clinical Research Regulations, Finally.
Emanuel EJ
N Engl J Med; 2015 Dec; 373(24):2296-9. PubMed ID: 26536071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Subjects or objects? Prisoners and human experimentation.
Lerner BH
N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(18):1806-7. PubMed ID: 17476006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The evolution of standards for experimental treatment or research.
Slovenko R
J Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(1):129-74. PubMed ID: 16317840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reassessing the influence of the Nuremberg Code on American medical ethics.
Moreno JD
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1997; 13(2):347-60. PubMed ID: 9212522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The historical, ethical, and legal background of human-subjects research.
Rice TW
Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1325-9. PubMed ID: 18811995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Challenges to human subject protections in US medical research.
Woodward B
JAMA; 1999 Nov; 282(20):1947-52. PubMed ID: 10580461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. U.S. medical research in the developing world: ignoring Nuremberg.
Roman J
Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2002; 11(2):441-60. PubMed ID: 12058774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Mengele's birthmark: the Nuremberg Code in United States courts.
Annas GJ
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():17-45. PubMed ID: 11645690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
Gandhi R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Trends in the social control of medical and psychiatric research.
Benson PR; Roth LH
Law Ment Health; 1988; 4():1-47. PubMed ID: 11655151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Nuremberg Code, German law, and prominent physician-thinkers.
Sass HM
JAMA; 1997 Mar; 277(9):709; author reply 709-10. PubMed ID: 9042833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Are research ethics bad for our mental health?
Michels R
N Engl J Med; 1999 May; 340(18):1427-30. PubMed ID: 10228197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
