These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16623307)

  • 1. MR angiography versus intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography of the lower extremities: activity-based cost analysis.
    Stacul F; Pozzi-Mucelli F; Lubin E; Gava S; Cuttin-Zernich R; Grisi G; Cova MA
    Radiol Med; 2006 Feb; 111(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 16623307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography vs intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography for carotid imaging: activity-based cost analysis.
    U-King-Im JM; Hollingworth W; Trivedi RA; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Graves MJ; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
    Eur Radiol; 2004 Apr; 14(4):730-5. PubMed ID: 14618366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The costs and effects of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and digital substraction angiography on quality of life in patients with peripheral arterial disease.
    Bosma J; Dijksman LM; Lam K; Wisselink W; van Swijndregt AD; Vahl A
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Apr; 55(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 23939383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance angiography versus intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography to follow-up patients with coiled intracranial aneurysms.
    Schaafsma JD; Koffijberg H; Buskens E; Velthuis BK; van der Graaf Y; Rinkel GJ
    Stroke; 2010 Aug; 41(8):1736-42. PubMed ID: 20595661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of magnetic resonance angiography for the preoperative evaluation of patients with infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease.
    Hoch JR; Tullis MJ; Kennell TW; McDermott J; Acher CW; Turnipseed WD
    J Vasc Surg; 1996 May; 23(5):792-800; discussion 801. PubMed ID: 8667500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost impact of diagnostic imaging for lower extremity peripheral vascular occlusive disease.
    Hay JW; Lawler E; Yucel K; Guo A; Balzer T; Gaziano JM; Scranton RE
    Value Health; 2009; 12(2):262-6. PubMed ID: 18657093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Costs in follow-up of endovascularly repaired abdominal aortic aneurysms. Magnetic resonance imaging with MR angiography versus EUROSTAR protocols.
    Engellau L; Albrechtsson U; Höjgård S; Norgren L; Larsson EM
    Int Angiol; 2003 Mar; 22(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 12771854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of contrast-enhanced multi-station MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography of the lower extremity arterial disease.
    Burbelko M; Augsten M; Kalinowski MO; Heverhagen JT
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jun; 37(6):1427-35. PubMed ID: 23188773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Arterial imaging in patients with lower extremity ischemia and diabetes mellitus.
    Pomposelli F
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Sep; 52(3 Suppl):81S-91S. PubMed ID: 20804938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease.
    Mell M; Tefera G; Thornton F; Siepman D; Turnipseed W
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(3):543-8; discussion 548. PubMed ID: 17223303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intra-arterial MR-angiography on an open-bore MR-scanner compared to digital-subtraction angiography of the infra-popliteal runoff in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
    Huegli RW; Thalhammer C; Jacob AL; Jaeger K; Bilecen D
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jun; 66(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 17658713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MR angiography of the pedal arteries with gadobenate dimeglumine, a contrast agent with increased relaxivity, and comparison with selective intraarterial DSA.
    Kreitner KF; Kunz RP; Herber S; Martenstein S; Dorweiler B; Dueber C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jan; 27(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 18058929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography for treatment planning in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a randomised controlled diagnostic trial.
    Vahl AC; Geselschap J; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Smit J; Sala J; Turkcan K; Dijksman LM; Visser MJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 May; 35(5):514-21; discussion 522-3. PubMed ID: 18201915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [MR angiography of the lower extremities with an automatic table translation (Mobitrak) compared to i.a. DSA].
    Busch HP; Hoffmann HG; Metzner C; Oettinger W
    Rofo; 1999 Mar; 170(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 10230437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of treatment plans for lower extremity arterial occlusive disease made with electrocardiography-triggered two-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Hoch JR; Kennell TW; Hollister MS; Sproat IA; Swan JS; Acher CW; Burks J; Heisey DM
    Am J Surg; 1999 Aug; 178(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 10487272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and duplex of the iliac arteries compared with intra-arterial pressure gradient measurements.
    Wikström J; Holmberg A; Johansson L; Löfberg AM; Smedby O; Karacagil S; Ahlström H
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2000 May; 19(5):516-23. PubMed ID: 10828234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonenhanced ECG-gated quiescent-interval single shot MRA: image quality and stenosis assessment at 3 tesla compared with contrast-enhanced MRA and digital subtraction angiography.
    Hansmann J; Morelli JN; Michaely HJ; Riester T; Budjan J; Schoenberg SO; Attenberger UI
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(6):1486-93. PubMed ID: 24338813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective feasibility study of duplex ultrasound arterial mapping, digital-subtraction angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography in management of critical lower limb ischemia by endovascular revascularization.
    Lowery AJ; Hynes N; Manning BJ; Mahendran M; Tawfik S; Sultan S
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2007 Jul; 21(4):443-51. PubMed ID: 17628263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic resonance angiography in infrapopliteal arterial disease: prospective comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.
    Diehm N; Kickuth R; Baumgartner I; Srivastav SK; Gretener S; Husmann MJ; Jaccard Y; Do do D; Triller J; Bonel HM
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):467-76. PubMed ID: 17507820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DSA versus multi-detector row CT angiography in peripheral arterial disease: randomized controlled trial.
    Kock MC; Adriaensen ME; Pattynama PM; van Sambeek MR; van Urk H; Stijnen T; Hunink MG
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):727-37. PubMed ID: 16244280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.