These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16623968)

  • 1. Preliminary results on correlation between neural response imaging and 'most comfortable levels' in cochlear implantation.
    Akin I; Kuran G; Saka C; Vural M
    J Laryngol Otol; 2006 Apr; 120(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 16623968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies.
    Han DM; Chen XQ; Zhao XT; Kong Y; Li YX; Liu S; Liu B; Mo LY
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing fitting in children using objective measures such as neural response imaging and electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold.
    Caner G; Olgun L; Gültekin G; Balaban M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):637-40. PubMed ID: 17667772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One-year results of the banded neural response imaging study.
    Akin I; Mutlu M; Kuran G; Dincer H; Arnold L; Boyle P
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):635-8. PubMed ID: 18580701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship between the intraoperative ECAP threshold and postoperative behavioral levels: the difference between postlingually deafened adults and prelingually deafened pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Morita T; Naito Y; Hirai T; Yamaguchi S; Ito J
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2003 Feb; 260(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 12582781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.
    Thai-Van H; Truy E; Charasse B; Boutitie F; Chanal JM; Cochard N; Piron JP; Ribas S; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Mondain M; Uziel A; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. AutoNR: an automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant via machine intelligence.
    Botros A; van Dijk B; Killian M
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 May; 40(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 16920343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y; Kaplan-Neeman R; Kronenberg J; Migirov L; Hildesheimer M; Muchnik C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 16720441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG; Skinner MW; Gotter BD; Strube MJ; Brenner CA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural response imaging (NRI) cochlear mapping: prospects for clinical application.
    Arnold L; Lindsey P; Hacking C; Boyle P
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2007 Dec; 8(4):173-88. PubMed ID: 18033738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic analysis of auditory nerve electrically evoked compound action potential with an artificial neural network.
    Charasse B; Thai-Van H; Chanal JM; Berger-Vachon C; Collet L
    Artif Intell Med; 2004 Jul; 31(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 15302088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? Part 2: On electrically evoked late auditory responses.
    Guiraud J; Gallego S; Arnold L; Boyle P; Truy E; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):44-57. PubMed ID: 17350776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural response telemetry in cochlear implant users.
    Kiss JG; Tóth F; Nagy AL; Jarabin J; Szamosközi A; Torkos A; Jóri J; Czigner J
    Int Tinnitus J; 2003; 9(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 14763333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multicentre investigation on electrically evoked compound action potential and stapedius reflex: how do these objective measures relate to implant programming parameters?
    Van Den Abbeele T; Noël-Petroff N; Akin I; Caner G; Olgun L; Guiraud J; Truy E; Attias J; Raveh E; Belgin E; Sennaroglu G; Basta D; Ernst A; Martini A; Rosignoli M; Levi H; Elidan J; Benghalem A; Amstutz-Montadert I; Lerosey Y; De Vel E; Dhooge I; Hildesheimer M; Kronenberg J; Arnold L
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Feb; 13(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 22340749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative analysis of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in implanted children with auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony.
    Runge-Samuelson CL; Drake S; Wackym PA
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 18025997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? (1): On electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses.
    Guiraud J; Gallego S; Arnold L; Boyle P; Truy E; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):48-60. PubMed ID: 17157463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in adults and children: effects of lateral to medial placement of the nucleus 24 contour electrode array.
    Runge-Samuelson C; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Wackym PA
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jun; 30(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 19300297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in an animal model of cochlear implants.
    Vischer M; Haenggeli A; Zhang J; Pelizzone M; Häusler R; Rouiller EM
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S27-9. PubMed ID: 9391586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiologic and objective monitoring of the cochlear implant during surgery: implementation, audit and outcomes.
    Mason S
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S33-8. PubMed ID: 15732380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.