These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16624478)

  • 1. Toward quantifying the effectiveness of water trading under uncertainty.
    Luo B; Huang GH; Zou Y; Yin YY
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Apr; 83(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 16624478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling climate change impacts on water trading.
    Luo B; Maqsood I; Gong Y
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Apr; 408(9):2034-41. PubMed ID: 20188398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An inexact fuzzy two-stage stochastic model for quantifying the efficiency of nonpoint source effluent trading under uncertainty.
    Luo B; Maqsood I; Huang GH; Yin YY; Han DJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2005 Jul; 347(1-3):21-34. PubMed ID: 16084964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simulation-based interval two-stage stochastic model for agricultural non-point source pollution control through land retirement.
    Luo B; Li JB; Huang GH; Li HL
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 May; 361(1-3):38-56. PubMed ID: 16242757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linking trading ratio with TMDL (total maximum daily load) allocation matrix and uncertainty analysis.
    Zhang HX
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 18653943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling and simulation of point-non-point source effluent trading in Taihu Lake area: perspective of non-point sources control in China.
    Wang X; Zhang W; Huang Y; Li S
    Sci Total Environ; 2004 Jun; 325(1-3):39-50. PubMed ID: 15144776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Watershed-based point sources permitting strategy and dynamic permit-trading analysis.
    Ning SK; Chang NB
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Sep; 84(4):427-46. PubMed ID: 16930806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inexact multistage stochastic integer programming for water resources management under uncertainty.
    Li YP; Huang GH; Nie SL; Liu L
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Jul; 88(1):93-107. PubMed ID: 17532113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-stage planning for sustainable water-quality management under uncertainty.
    Li YP; Huang GH
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jun; 90(8):2402-13. PubMed ID: 19264389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Baseline requirements can hinder trades in water quality trading programs: Evidence from the Conestoga watershed.
    Ghosh G; Ribaudo M; Shortle J
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Aug; 92(8):2076-84. PubMed ID: 21507559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effluent trading for water quality management: concept and application to the Chesapeake Bay watershed.
    Nishizawa E
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2003; 47(1-6):169-74. PubMed ID: 12787615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrated modelling under uncertainty in watershed-level assessment and management.
    Ham JH; Yoon CG; Jung KW; Jang JH
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):31-9. PubMed ID: 17978430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the influence of likelihood measure formulation in the GLUE methodology.
    Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Dec; 408(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 19819524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Including non-point sfources in a water quality trading permit program.
    Collentine D
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(3-4):47-53. PubMed ID: 15850173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An imprecise fuzzy risk approach for water quality management of a river system.
    Rehana S; Mujumdar PP
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 90(11):3653-64. PubMed ID: 19674829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parameter uncertainty analysis of the non-point source pollution in the Daning River watershed of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China.
    Shen Z; Hong Q; Yu H; Liu R
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Nov; 405(1-3):195-205. PubMed ID: 18639918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long term prospective of the Seine River system: confronting climatic and direct anthropogenic changes.
    Ducharne A; Baubion C; Beaudoin N; Benoit M; Billen G; Brisson N; Garnier J; Kieken H; Lebonvallet S; Ledoux E; Mary B; Mignolet C; Poux X; Sauboua E; Schott C; Théry S; Viennot P
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Apr; 375(1-3):292-311. PubMed ID: 17258297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effluent trading planning and its application in water quality management: A factor-interaction perspective.
    Zhang JL; Li YP; Zeng XT; Huang GH; Li Y; Zhu Y; Kong FL; Xi M; Liu J
    Environ Res; 2019 Jan; 168():286-305. PubMed ID: 30366281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Economic total maximum daily load for watershed-based pollutant trading.
    Zaidi AZ; deMonsabert SM
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Apr; 22(8):6308-24. PubMed ID: 25487554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inexact rough-interval two-stage stochastic programming for conjunctive water allocation problems.
    Lu H; Huang G; He L
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Oct; 91(1):261-9. PubMed ID: 19767138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.