These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16624511)

  • 1. Spiral ganglion cell site of excitation I: comparison of scala tympani and intrameatal electrode responses.
    Cartee LA; Miller CA; van den Honert C
    Hear Res; 2006 May; 215(1-2):10-21. PubMed ID: 16624511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spiral ganglion cell site of excitation II: numerical model analysis.
    Cartee LA
    Hear Res; 2006 May; 215(1-2):22-30. PubMed ID: 16624510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a model of the cochlear neural membrane. I. Physiological measurement of membrane characteristics in response to intrameatal electrical stimulation.
    Cartee LA; van den Honert C; Finley CC; Miller RL
    Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 146(1-2):143-52. PubMed ID: 10913891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrical impedance measurements of cochlear structures using the four-electrode reflection-coefficient technique.
    Kumar G; Chokshi M; Richter CP
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):86-94. PubMed ID: 19857561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear pathology following reimplantation of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array in the macaque.
    Shepherd RK; Clark GM; Xu SA; Pyman BC
    Am J Otol; 1995 Mar; 16(2):186-99. PubMed ID: 8572119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tissue impedance and current flow in the implanted ear. Implications for the cochlear prosthesis.
    Spelman FA; Clopton BM; Pfingst BE
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 98():3-8. PubMed ID: 6814331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory nerve fiber excitability for alternative electrode placement in the obstructed human cochlea: electrode insertion in scala vestibuli versus scala tympani.
    Fellner A; Wenger C; Heshmat A; Rattay F
    J Neural Eng; 2024 Aug; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 39029505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Topographic organization of the cochlear spiral ganglion demonstrated by restricted lesions of the anteroventral cochlear nucleus.
    Leake PA; Snyder RL; Merzenich MM
    J Comp Neurol; 1992 Jun; 320(4):468-78. PubMed ID: 1629399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of an electrode for the artificial cochlear sensory epithelium.
    Tona Y; Inaoka T; Ito J; Kawano S; Nakagawa T
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):106-12. PubMed ID: 26299844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Impedance between modiolus and different walls of scala tympani].
    Du Q; Wang Z
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 22(19):878-9. PubMed ID: 19160859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural mechanisms relevant to the design of an auditory prosthesis. Location and electrical characteristics.
    Clopton BM; Spelman FA
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 98():9-14. PubMed ID: 6814332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: a model approach.
    Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 214(1-2):17-27. PubMed ID: 16520009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation.
    Shepherd RK; Hatsushika S; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1993 Mar; 66(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8473242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation in cats].
    Ni DF
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1993; 28(1):11-3, 58. PubMed ID: 8352990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial organization of inner hair cell synapses and cochlear spiral ganglion neurons.
    Leake PA; Snyder RL; Hradek GT
    J Comp Neurol; 1993 Jul; 333(2):257-70. PubMed ID: 8345106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stochastic population model for electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.
    Imennov NS; Rubinstein JT
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Oct; 56(10):2493-501. PubMed ID: 19304476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of electrical current configuration on potential fields in the electrically stimulated cochlea: field models and measurements.
    Spelman FA; Pfingst BE; Clopton BM; Jolly CN; Rodenhiser KL
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():131-6. PubMed ID: 7668604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of electrode-to-fiber distance on temporal neural response with electrical stimulation.
    Mino H; Rubinstein JT; Miller CA; Abbas PJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jan; 51(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 14723489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Penetrating multichannel stimulation and recording electrodes in auditory prosthesis research.
    Anderson DJ
    Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 242(1-2):31-41. PubMed ID: 18343062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 2. Spread of the effective stimulation field (ESF), from ECAP and FEA.
    Cohen LT
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):100-11. PubMed ID: 19063955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.