398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16625036)
21. Monte Carlo computed machine-specific correction factors for reference dosimetry of TomoTherapy static beam for several ion chambers.
Sterpin E; Mackie TR; Vynckier S
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4066-72. PubMed ID: 22830739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Beam quality conversion factor].
Kawachi T; Katayose T
Igaku Butsuri; 2013; 33(4):186-91. PubMed ID: 24893494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of two water-equivalent phantom materials for output calibration of photon and electron beams.
Liu L; Prasad SC; Bassano DA
Med Dosim; 2003; 28(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 14684192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. CyberKnife reference dosimetry: An assessment of the impact of evolving recommendations on correction factors and measured dose.
Buchegger N; Grogan G; Hug B; Oliver C; Ebert M
Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3573-3585. PubMed ID: 32311095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Implementation of water calorimetry in a 180 MeV scanned pulsed proton beam including an experimental determination of kQ for a Farmer chamber.
Medin J
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(12):3287-98. PubMed ID: 20484778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dosimetric characteristics of electron beams produced by a mobile accelerator for IORT.
Pimpinella M; Mihailescu D; Guerra AS; Laitano RF
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(20):6197-214. PubMed ID: 17921580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Proton beam monitor chamber calibration.
Gomà C; Lorentini S; Meer D; Safai S
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Sep; 59(17):4961-71. PubMed ID: 25109620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A calibration procedure for beam monitors in a scanned beam of heavy charged particles.
Jäkel O; Hartmann GH; Karger CP; Heeg P; Vatnitsky S
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1009-13. PubMed ID: 15191285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Correction factors for A1SL ionization chamber dosimetry in TomoTherapy: machine-specific, plan-class, and clinical fields.
Gago-Arias A; Rodriguez-Romero R; Sanchez-Rubio P; Miguel Gonzalez-Castano D; Gomez F; Nunez L; Palmans H; Sharpe P; Pardo-Montero J
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1964-70. PubMed ID: 22482617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Development of a guarded liquid ionization chamber for clinical dosimetry.
Stewart KJ; Elliott A; Seuntjens JP
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3089-104. PubMed ID: 17505091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A dosimetric system for quantitative cell irradiation experiments with laser-accelerated protons.
Richter C; Karsch L; Dammene Y; Kraft SD; Metzkes J; Schramm U; Schürer M; Sobiella M; Weber A; Zeil K; Pawelke J
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Mar; 56(6):1529-43. PubMed ID: 21325708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of dose calibration by ionometric and chemical dosimetry for 6- and 45-MV x-ray beams.
Zwicker RD; Wu A; Sternick ES
Med Phys; 1991; 18(6):1251-3. PubMed ID: 1753913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reference dosimetry on TomoTherapy: an addendum to the 1990 UK MV dosimetry code of practice.
Thomas SJ; Aspradakis MM; Byrne JP; Chalmers G; Duane S; Rogers J; Thomas RA; Tudor GS; Twyman N;
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 59(6):1339-52. PubMed ID: 24583900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Determination of absorbed dose to water for high energy photon and electron beams--comparison of different dosimetry protocols].
Zakaria GA; Schütte W
Z Med Phys; 2003; 13(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 14732959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Kwok CB
Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1217-25. PubMed ID: 10902550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Clinical calibration dosimetry in JSMP-01: measurements using plane-parallel ion chambers.].
Araki F; Kumagai K; Yoshiura T; Oura H; Tachibana M; Moribe N; Tajima H; Yoshida A; Kido T
Igaku Butsuri; 2005; 25(3):114-23. PubMed ID: 16373987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Determination of absorbed dose for photon and electron beams from a linear accelerator by comparing various protocols on different phantoms.
Banjade DP; Tajuddin AA; Shukri A
Appl Radiat Isot; 2001 Aug; 55(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 11393765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Kilovoltage x-ray dosimetry--an experimental comparison between different dosimetry protocols.
Munck af Rosenschöld P; Nilsson P; Knöös T
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(16):4431-42. PubMed ID: 18670053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dosimetric characteristics of a MOSFET dosimeter for clinical electron beams.
Manigandan D; Bharanidharan G; Aruna P; Devan K; Elangovan D; Patil V; Tamilarasan R; Vasanthan S; Ganesan S
Phys Med; 2009 Sep; 25(3):141-7. PubMed ID: 19128995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An experimental evaluation of recent electron dosimetry codes of practice.
Nisbet A; Thwaites DI; Nahum AE; Pitchford WG
Phys Med Biol; 1998 Aug; 43(8):1999-2014. PubMed ID: 9725585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
