294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16625173)
21. The joy of discovery.
de Duve C
Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7317):S5. PubMed ID: 20944620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Three cheers for peers.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Chinese Academic Assessment and Incentive System.
Suo Q
Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Feb; 22(1):297-9. PubMed ID: 25794900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Data audit would reduce unethical behaviour.
Shamoo AE
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Peer review. Editorial.
Kenyon G; Youngs R
J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Dec; 123(12):1299-300. PubMed ID: 19958561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Double-blind review: the paw print is a giveaway.
Naqvi KR
Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Corporate culture has no place in academia.
Hallonsten O
Nature; 2016 Oct; 538(7623):7. PubMed ID: 27708316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Guide for peer reviewers of scientific article].
Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
Lijec Vjesn; 2005; 127(5-6):107-11. PubMed ID: 16281469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The real dirty secret of academic publishing.
Svetlov V
Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):897. PubMed ID: 15496892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Peer reviewers need more nurturing.
Catlow R
Nature; 2017 Dec; 552(7685):293. PubMed ID: 29293240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Next steps in the Schön affair.
Kennedy D
Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5593):495. PubMed ID: 12386303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Scientific research and the human condition.
Perez Velazquez JL
Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6918):13. PubMed ID: 12511929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Emerging Investigators issue.
Mol Biosyst; 2008 Jun; 4(6):465. PubMed ID: 18493638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Pre-peer review, peer review, and post-peer review: three areas with potential for improvement.
Stang A; Poole C; Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):309-10. PubMed ID: 18313552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The petty crimes perpetuated by academia: scientific literature's death by a thousand cuts.
Slade E; Tamber PS
Menopause Int; 2007 Sep; 13(3):95-7. PubMed ID: 17785034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Peer review: phony data, shoddy work or revolutionary results? "Truth will out".
Friedman JH
Med Health R I; 2000 Jul; 83(7):198. PubMed ID: 10934817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Why are people reluctant to join in open review?
Liu SV
Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7148):1052. PubMed ID: 17597736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. AI peer reviewers unleashed to ease publishing grind.
Heaven D
Nature; 2018 Nov; 563(7733):609-610. PubMed ID: 30482927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The do's and don't's of submitting scientific papers.
Walsh PJ; Mommsen TP; Nilsson GE
Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 152(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 19146976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Reviewers' reports should in turn be peer reviewed.
List A
Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7098):26. PubMed ID: 16823432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
