These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16625733)

  • 1. The nanny state meets the inner lawyer: overregulating while underprotecting human participants in research.
    Gunsalus CK
    Ethics Behav; 2004; 14(4):369-82. PubMed ID: 16625733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rethinking protections for human subjects.
    Gunsalus CK
    Chron High Educ; 2002 Nov; 49(12):B34. PubMed ID: 15287114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical research on research ethics.
    Sieber JE
    Ethics Behav; 2004; 14(4):397-412. PubMed ID: 16625736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Institutional review of medical research. Cost-benefit analysis, risk-benefit analysis, and "the possible effects of research on public policy".
    Schwartz RL
    J Leg Med; 1983 Jun; 4(2):143-66. PubMed ID: 6411846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using our best judgment in conducting human research.
    Sieber JE
    Ethics Behav; 2004; 14(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 16622989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethical oversight of research in developing countries.
    Kass N; Dawson L; Loyo-Berrios NI
    IRB; 2003; 25(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 12833901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethics review of social, behavioral, and economic research: where should we go from here?
    De Vries R; DeBruin DA; Goodgame A
    Ethics Behav; 2004; 14(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 16625729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interviews that do not require review by IRBs.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Dec; 18(12):3. PubMed ID: 15027430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conducting industrial and organizational psychological research: institutional review of research in work organizations.
    Ilgen DR; Bell BS
    Ethics Behav; 2001; 11(4):395-412. PubMed ID: 11838504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human participants challenges in youth-focused research: perspectives and practices of IRB administrators.
    Wagener DK; Sporer AK; Simmerling M; Flome JL; An C; Curry SJ
    Ethics Behav; 2004; 14(4):335-49. PubMed ID: 16625728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Animal research: a call for legislative reform requiring ethical merit review.
    Brody M
    HELR Harvard Environ Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):423-84. PubMed ID: 11659214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Continuing review of research involving human subjects: approach to the problem and remaining areas of concern.
    Gordon B; Prentice E
    IRB; 1997; 19(2):8-11. PubMed ID: 11655323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The history of institutional review boards.
    Sherman M; Van Vleet JD
    Regul Aff J; 1991; 3():615-27. PubMed ID: 11651491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Harmonizing regulations for biomedical research: a critical analysis of the US and Venezuelan systems.
    Di Tillio-Gonzalez D; Fischbach RL
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):167-77. PubMed ID: 17488491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Teaching research ethics: illustrating the nature of the researcher-IRB relationship.
    Brinthaupt TM
    Teach Psychol; 2002; 29(3):243-5. PubMed ID: 15295829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overseeing regulations or intimidating researchers?
    Wax ML; Capron AM
    IRB; 1981 Apr; 3(4):8-12. PubMed ID: 11661947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human participants challenges in youth tobacco cessation research: researchers' perspectives.
    Diviak KR; Curry SJ; Emery SL; Mermelstein RJ
    Ethics Behav; 2004; 14(4):321-34. PubMed ID: 16625727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The task for ethics review: should research ethics boards address an approach or a paradigm?
    Nelson CH; McPherson DH
    NCEHR Commun; 2004; 12(2):11-22. PubMed ID: 15460563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is compliance a professional virtue of researchers? Reflections on promoting the responsible conduct of research.
    DuBois JM
    Ethics Behav; 2004; 14(4):383-95. PubMed ID: 16625734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revising human subjects policy: an example of consensual decision-making.
    Cohen JM; Hedberg WB
    J Soc Res Adm; 1984; 15(4):29-34. PubMed ID: 11649707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.