These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16625736)

  • 21. Institutional review boards not paying enough attention to active research projects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Nov; 13(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
    Klitzman R
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neurobiological research involving human subjects: perspectives from the Office for Protection from Research Risks.
    Puglisi JT; Ellis GB
    Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):261-5. PubMed ID: 11654521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Federal commissions and local IRBs.
    Yesley MS
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):11-2. PubMed ID: 6643032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The task for ethics review: should research ethics boards address an approach or a paradigm?
    Nelson CH; McPherson DH
    NCEHR Commun; 2004; 12(2):11-22. PubMed ID: 15460563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Teaching research ethics: illustrating the nature of the researcher-IRB relationship.
    Brinthaupt TM
    Teach Psychol; 2002; 29(3):243-5. PubMed ID: 15295829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Conducting empirical research on informed consent: challenges and questions.
    Sachs GA; Hougham GW; Sugarman J; Agre P; Broome ME; Geller G; Kass N; Kodish E; Mintz J; Roberts LW; Sankar P; Siminoff LA; Sorenson J; Weiss A
    IRB; 2003; Suppl 25(5):S4-S10. PubMed ID: 14870730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Law would remove ability of institutional review boards to waive written consent.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1996 Aug; 11(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intellectual freedom and editorial responsibilities within the context of controversial research.
    Pittenger DJ
    Ethics Behav; 2003; 13(2):105-25. PubMed ID: 14552312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Is national, independent oversight needed for the protection of human subjects?
    Capron AM
    Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):283-92. PubMed ID: 11658183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Why HHS should reconsider its proposed exemption for social policy experiments.
    Abram MB;
    IRB; 1982 May; 4(5):10-2. PubMed ID: 11649408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perspectives of research participants, psychologist investigators, and institutional review boards.
    Schreier BA; Stadler HA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1067-72. PubMed ID: 1501970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Normative arguments and new solutions for the unbiased registration and publication of clinical trials.
    Strech D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Mar; 65(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 22014887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. National Research Service Awards and Protection of Human Subjects Act.
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1973 Sep; 119(131):S16333-52. PubMed ID: 11663135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ethical issues: a survey of institutional review boards.
    Davis AJ
    West J Nurs Res; 1980; 2(2):536-8. PubMed ID: 6904137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Human subject research review in the Department of Defense.
    Winter PE
    IRB; 1984; 6(3):9-10. PubMed ID: 11649568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Changing federal regulation of IRBs, Part III: social research and the proposed DHEW regulations.
    Gray BH
    IRB; 1980 Jan; 2(1):1-5+. PubMed ID: 11661793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ethical issues in administrative continuous improvement. Applying the concept of prior notification to the conduct of firm trials.
    Goldberg HI
    Med Care; 1990 Sep; 28(9):822-33. PubMed ID: 2205768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How factual do we want the facts? Criteria for a critical appraisal of empirical research for use in ethics.
    Strech D
    J Med Ethics; 2010 Apr; 36(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 20338933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Internet research: an opportunity to revisit classic ethical problems in behavioral research.
    Pittenger DJ
    Ethics Behav; 2003; 13(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 14552304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.