141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16626078)
1. Bone graft substitutes for use in spinal fusions.
Helm GA
Clin Neurosurg; 2005; 52():250-5. PubMed ID: 16626078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of osteobiologics in spinal deformity.
Cheng I; Oshtory R; Wildstein MS
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2007 Apr; 18(2):393-401. PubMed ID: 17556142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Current use of biologic graft extenders for spinal fusion.
Coseo NM; Saldua N; Harrop J
J Neurosurg Sci; 2012 Sep; 56(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 22854588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An update on bone substitutes for spinal fusion.
Miyazaki M; Tsumura H; Wang JC; Alanay A
Eur Spine J; 2009 Jun; 18(6):783-99. PubMed ID: 19280232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bone graft substitutes in spine surgery.
Khan SN; Sandhu HS; Parvataneni HK; Girardi FP; Cammisa FP
Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 2000; 59(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 10789032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Synthetic porous ceramic compared with autograft in scoliosis surgery.
Molano CB
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1998 Jul; 80(4):747. PubMed ID: 9699854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Osteoinductive bone graft substitutes for lumbar fusion.
Smoljanovic T; Dokuzovic S; Bojanic I
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Sep; 13(3):407-9. PubMed ID: 20809739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Demineralized bone matrix and spinal arthrodesis.
Lee KJ; Roper JG; Wang JC
Spine J; 2005; 5(6 Suppl):217S-223S. PubMed ID: 16291116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biological approaches to spinal instrumentation and fusion in spinal deformity surgery.
Mummaneni PV; Meyer SA; Wu JC
Clin Neurosurg; 2011; 58():110-6. PubMed ID: 21916134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomaterials and Bioactive Agents in Spinal Fusion.
Duarte RM; Varanda P; Reis RL; Duarte ARC; Correia-Pinto J
Tissue Eng Part B Rev; 2017 Dec; 23(6):540-551. PubMed ID: 28514897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone graft substitutes for spinal fusion.
Whang PG; Wang JC
Spine J; 2003; 3(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 14589231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone substitutes: an update.
Giannoudis PV; Dinopoulos H; Tsiridis E
Injury; 2005 Nov; 36 Suppl 3():S20-7. PubMed ID: 16188545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhancing spinal fusion.
Benzel EC; Gilbertson L; Mericle RA
Clin Neurosurg; 2008; 55():63-71. PubMed ID: 19248669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Macroscopic and histologic analyses of de novo bone in the posterior spine at time of spinal implant removal.
Birch N; D'Souza WL
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Aug; 22(6):434-8. PubMed ID: 19652571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spinal fusion surgery obviating bone graft harvest--a reality in the near future.
Shukur MH
Med J Malaysia; 2005 Jul; 60 Suppl C():1-2. PubMed ID: 16381272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone graft extenders.
Geisler FH
J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Oct; 3(4):332; author reply 332-3. PubMed ID: 16266077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Allogenic bone graft in spondylodesis].
Messner P; Horn V
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 1985 Apr; 52(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 3892991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic versus static cervical plating for fusion: what about the interbody graft?
Dickerman RD; Reynolds AS; Tackett J; Beugler DM; Bennett M
Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):336; author reply 337. PubMed ID: 18757246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Spinal fusions: bone and bone substitutes.
Marchesi DG
Eur Spine J; 2000 Oct; 9(5):372-8. PubMed ID: 11057529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. rhBMP-6 stimulated osteoprogenitor cells enhance posterolateral spinal fusion in the New Zealand white rabbit.
Valdes M; Moore DC; Palumbo M; Lucas PR; Robertson A; Appel J; Ehrlich MG; Keeping HS
Spine J; 2007; 7(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 17482115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
