927 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16626379)
1. The Behind-the-Knee test: an efficient model for evaluating mechanical and chemical irritation.
Farage MA
Skin Res Technol; 2006 May; 12(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 16626379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of a sensitive test method to evaluate mechanical irritation potential on mucosal skin.
Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D
Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 15059175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of modifications of the traditional patch test in assessing the chemical irritation potential of feminine hygiene products.
Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D
Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):73-84. PubMed ID: 15059174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cumulative skin irritation test of sanitary pads in sensitive skin and normal skin population.
Farage MA; Maibach H
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17464747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The vulvar epithelium differs from the skin: implications for cutaneous testing to address topical vulvar exposures.
Farage M; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Oct; 51(4):201-9. PubMed ID: 15500670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dermatological testing of an emollient-treated menstrual pad with a novel foam absorbent core.
Farage MA; Segarra VS; Bramante M; Elsner P; Maibach HI
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2008; 27(4):333-43. PubMed ID: 19037765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating lotion transfer from products to skin using the behind-the-knee test.
Farage MA
Skin Res Technol; 2010 May; 16(2):243-52. PubMed ID: 20456105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative assessment of the acute skin irritation potential of detergent formulations using a novel human 4-h patch test method.
Robinson MK; Kruszewski FH; Al-Atrash J; Blazka ME; Gingell R; Heitfeld FA; Mallon D; Snyder NK; Swanson JE; Casterton PL
Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Dec; 43(12):1703-12. PubMed ID: 16026914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing menstrual tampon irritation using the "Behind-The-Knee" test.
Farage MA; Miller KW; Ledger WJ
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Mar; 287(3):435-9. PubMed ID: 23179806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can the behind-the-knee clinical test be used to evaluate the mechanical and chemical irritation potential for products intended for contact with mucous membranes?
Farage MA; Miller KW; Ledger WJ
Curr Probl Dermatol; 2011; 40():125-132. PubMed ID: 21325847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of lotion formulations on irritation using the modified forearm-controlled application test method.
Farage MA; Ebrahimpour A; Steimle B; Englehart J; Smith D
Skin Res Technol; 2007 Aug; 13(3):268-79. PubMed ID: 17610648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of the cytosensor microphysiometer to predict results of a 21-day cumulative irritation patch test in humans.
Landin WE; Mun GC; Nims RW; Harbell JW
Toxicol In Vitro; 2007 Sep; 21(6):1165-73. PubMed ID: 17475442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dermatological testing of an improved apertured film surface for feminine hygiene pads.
Farage MA; Wang B; Tucker H; Ogle J; Rodenberg C; Azuka CE; Klebba C; Wilhelm KP
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2012 Sep; 31(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 22141375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlating sensory effects with irritation.
Farage MA; Santana MV; Henley E
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2005; 24(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 17040887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating lotion transfer to skin from feminine protection products.
Farage M
Skin Res Technol; 2008 Feb; 14(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 18211600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the dermal compatibility of a new female incontinence product line.
Gutshall D; Zhou S; Wang B; Farage MA; Hochwalt AE
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2016 Dec; 35(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 26621074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of skin irritation potential in the human 4-h patch test.
Basketter DA; York M; McFadden JP; Robinson MK
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 15291823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of usage practices, ethnicity and climate on the skin compatibility of sanitary pads.
Farage M; Elsner P; Maibach H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Jun; 275(6):415-27. PubMed ID: 17514373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhancement of visual scoring of skin irritant reactions using cross-polarized light and parallel-polarized light.
Farage MA
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 18279152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The study of human skin irritation of a novel herbal skin care product and ingredients by human single closed patch testing.
Wattanakrai P; Suwanachote S; Kulkollakarn S; Rajatanavin N
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Jun; 90(6):1116-22. PubMed ID: 17624205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
