BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16626497)

  • 1. The statistics of identifying differentially expressed genes in Expresso and TM4: a comparison.
    Sioson AA; Mane SP; Li P; Sha W; Heath LS; Bohnert HJ; Grene R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Apr; 7():215. PubMed ID: 16626497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new outlier removal approach for cDNA microarray normalization.
    Wu Y; Yan L; Liu H; Sun H; Xie H
    Biotechniques; 2009 Aug; 47(2):691-2, 694-700. PubMed ID: 19737130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utilization of two sample t-test statistics from redundant probe sets to evaluate different probe set algorithms in GeneChip studies.
    Hu Z; Willsky GR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Jan; 7():12. PubMed ID: 16403228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical analysis of high-density oligonucleotide arrays: a multiplicative noise model.
    Sásik R; Calvo E; Corbeil J
    Bioinformatics; 2002 Dec; 18(12):1633-40. PubMed ID: 12490448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. TM4 microarray software suite.
    Saeed AI; Bhagabati NK; Braisted JC; Liang W; Sharov V; Howe EA; Li J; Thiagarajan M; White JA; Quackenbush J
    Methods Enzymol; 2006; 411():134-93. PubMed ID: 16939790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying differentially expressed genes from microarray experiments via statistic synthesis.
    Yang YH; Xiao Y; Segal MR
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 21(7):1084-93. PubMed ID: 15513985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Normality of oligonucleotide microarray data and implications for parametric statistical analyses.
    Giles PJ; Kipling D
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Nov; 19(17):2254-62. PubMed ID: 14630654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The balance of reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity of lists of differentially expressed genes in microarray studies.
    Shi L; Jones WD; Jensen RV; Harris SC; Perkins RG; Goodsaid FM; Guo L; Croner LJ; Boysen C; Fang H; Qian F; Amur S; Bao W; Barbacioru CC; Bertholet V; Cao XM; Chu TM; Collins PJ; Fan XH; Frueh FW; Fuscoe JC; Guo X; Han J; Herman D; Hong H; Kawasaki ES; Li QZ; Luo Y; Ma Y; Mei N; Peterson RL; Puri RK; Shippy R; Su Z; Sun YA; Sun H; Thorn B; Turpaz Y; Wang C; Wang SJ; Warrington JA; Willey JC; Wu J; Xie Q; Zhang L; Zhang L; Zhong S; Wolfinger RD; Tong W
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 9 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S10. PubMed ID: 18793455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Normalization of microarray data using a spatial mixed model analysis which includes splines.
    Baird D; Johnstone P; Wilson T
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(17):3196-205. PubMed ID: 15231532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic variation normalization in microarray data to get gene expression comparison unbiased.
    Chou JW; Paules RS; Bushel PR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2005 Apr; 3(2):225-41. PubMed ID: 15852502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of normalization on the correlation structure of microarray data.
    Qiu X; Brooks AI; Klebanov L; Yakovlev N
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 6():120. PubMed ID: 15904488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New normalization methods for cDNA microarray data.
    Wilson DL; Buckley MJ; Helliwell CA; Wilson IW
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jul; 19(11):1325-32. PubMed ID: 12874043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological study of affine transformations of gene expression data with proposed robust non-parametric multi-dimensional normalization method.
    Bengtsson H; Hössjer O
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 7():100. PubMed ID: 16509971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A robust two-way semi-linear model for normalization of cDNA microarray data.
    Wang D; Huang J; Xie H; Manzella L; Soares MB
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 6():14. PubMed ID: 15663789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of DNA microarray data transformation on gene expression analysis - comparison of two normalization methods.
    Schmidt MT; Handschuh L; Zyprych J; Szabelska A; Olejnik-Schmidt AK; Siatkowski I; Figlerowicz M
    Acta Biochim Pol; 2011; 58(4):573-80. PubMed ID: 22187680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A generalized likelihood ratio test to identify differentially expressed genes from microarray data.
    Wang S; Ethier S
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Jan; 20(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 14693815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative quality control in microarray experiments and the application in data filtering, normalization and false positive rate prediction.
    Wang X; Hessner MJ; Wu Y; Pati N; Ghosh S
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jul; 19(11):1341-7. PubMed ID: 12874045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A robust neural networks approach for spatial and intensity-dependent normalization of cDNA microarray data.
    Tarca AL; Cooke JE; Mackay J
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(11):2674-83. PubMed ID: 15797913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Replication, variation and normalisation in microarray experiments.
    Altman N
    Appl Bioinformatics; 2005; 4(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 16000011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.