238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16627032)
1. Acceptability and satisfaction using Quick Start with the contraceptive vaginal ring versus an oral contraceptive.
Schafer JE; Osborne LM; Davis AR; Westhoff C
Contraception; 2006 May; 73(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 16627032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bleeding patterns after immediate initiation of an oral compared with a vaginal hormonal contraceptive.
Westhoff C; Osborne LM; Schafer JE; Morroni C
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jul; 106(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 15994622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High acceptability and satisfaction with NuvaRing use.
Szarewski A
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2002 Dec; 7 Suppl 2():31-6; discussion 37-9. PubMed ID: 12659400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Initiation of oral contraceptives using a quick start compared with a conventional start: a randomized controlled trial.
Westhoff C; Heartwell S; Edwards S; Zieman M; Cushman L; Robilotto C; Stuart G; Morroni C; Kalmuss D
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1270-6. PubMed ID: 17540797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measured and reported weight change for women using a vaginal contraceptive ring vs. a low-dose oral contraceptive.
O'Connell KJ; Osborne LM; Westhoff C
Contraception; 2005 Nov; 72(5):323-7. PubMed ID: 16246655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acceptability of the vaginal diaphragm among current users.
Maher JE; Harvey SM; Bird ST; Stevens VJ; Beckman LJ
Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2004; 36(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 15136209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors associated with willingness to use the contraceptive vaginal ring.
Gilliam M; Holmquist S; Berlin A
Contraception; 2007 Jul; 76(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 17586133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The contraceptive vaginal ring compared with the combined oral contraceptive pill: a comprehensive review of randomized controlled trials.
Roumen FJ
Contraception; 2007 Jun; 75(6):420-9. PubMed ID: 17519147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison between the vaginal ring and oral contraceptives.
Veres S; Miller L; Burington B
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 104(3):555-63. PubMed ID: 15339769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Women's experience and satisfaction with emergency contraception.
Harvey SM; Beckman LJ; Sherman C; Petitti D
Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(5):237-40, 260. PubMed ID: 10723648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing patient telephone callback rates for different hormonal birth control delivery systems.
Victor I; Fink RA
Am J Ther; 2006; 13(6):507-12. PubMed ID: 17122531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors affecting women's selection of a combined hormonal contraceptive method: the TEAM-06 Spanish cross-sectional study.
Lete I; Doval JL; Pérez-Campos E; Sánchez-Borrego R; Correa M; de la Viuda E; Gómez MA; González JV; Lertxundi R; Martínez MT; Mendoza N; Robledo J
Contraception; 2007 Aug; 76(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 17656174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Safety and acceptability with the use of a contraceptive vaginal ring after surgical or medical abortion.
Fine PM; Tryggestad J; Meyers NJ; Sangi-Haghpeykar H
Contraception; 2007 May; 75(5):367-71. PubMed ID: 17434018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The combined contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing): first experience in daily clinical practice in The Netherlands.
Roumen FJ; op ten Berg MM; Hoomans EH
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2006 Mar; 11(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 16546812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Individualization of low-dose oral contraceptives. Pharmacological principles and practical indications for oral contraceptives].
Cianci A; De Leo V
Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Aug; 59(4):415-25. PubMed ID: 17923832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. User's perception of the contraceptive vaginal ring: a field study in Brazil and the Dominican Republic.
Hardy EE; Reyes Q; Gomez F; Portes-Carrasco R; Faúndes A
Stud Fam Plann; 1983 Nov; 14(11):284-90. PubMed ID: 6417842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cycle control, tolerability, efficacy and acceptability of the vaginal contraceptive ring, NuvaRing: results of clinical experience in Germany.
Brucker C; Karck U; Merkle E
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2008 Mar; 13(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 17853162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of two types of hormonal contraception--oral versus intravaginal--on the sexual life of women and their partners.
Guida M; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Bramante S; Sparice S; Acunzo G; Tommaselli GA; Di Carlo C; Pellicano M; Greco E; Nappi C
Hum Reprod; 2005 Apr; 20(4):1100-6. PubMed ID: 15608030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Self-described impact of noncompliance among users of a combined hormonal contraceptive method.
Lete I; Doval JL; Pérez-Campos E; Lertxundi R; Correa M; de la Viuda E; Gómez MA; González JV; Martínez MT; Mendoza N; Robledo J
Contraception; 2008 Apr; 77(4):276-82. PubMed ID: 18342651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective memory affects satisfaction with the contraceptive pill.
Matter S; Meier B
Contraception; 2008 Aug; 78(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 18672112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
