These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16627161)

  • 1. Analysis of 16 retrieved proximal cemented femoral stems.
    Cristofolini L; Baleani M; Toni A
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Apr; 21(3):464-5; author reply 465-7. PubMed ID: 16627161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of 16 retrieved proximally cemented femoral stems.
    Jones RE; Willie BM; Hayes H; Bloebaum RD
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jan; 20(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 15660065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Partially cemented AncaDualFit hip stems do not fail in simulated active patients.
    Cristofolini L; Erani P; Teutonico AS; Traina F; Viceconti M; Toni A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Feb; 22(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 17070631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of surface finish and of vertical ribs on the stability of a cemented femoral stem: an in vitro stair climbing test.
    Jamali AA; Lozynsky AJ; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jan; 21(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 16446196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of modular tapered fluted stems on proximal stress shielding in the human femur.
    Hnat WP; Conway JS; Malkani AL; Yakkanti MR; Voor MJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):957-62. PubMed ID: 18848422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fractures of modern high nitrogen stainless steel cemented stems: cause, mechanism, and avoidance in 14 cases.
    Yates PJ; Quraishi NA; Kop A; Howie DW; Marx C; Swarts E
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Feb; 23(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 18280411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative in vitro study on the long-term performance of cemented hip stems: validation of a protocol to discriminate between "good" and "bad" designs.
    Paul JP
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):395; author reply 395-6. PubMed ID: 16263127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture load for periprosthetic femoral fractures in cemented versus uncemented hip stems: an experimental in vitro study.
    Thomsen MN; Jakubowitz E; Seeger JB; Lee C; Kretzer JP; Clarius M
    Orthopedics; 2008 Jul; 31(7):653. PubMed ID: 19292385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Cementless fixation of endoprostheses].
    Bensmann G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1990; 35 Suppl 3():44-7. PubMed ID: 2078759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
    Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surface oxidized zirconium total hip arthroplasty head damage due to closed reduction effects on polyethylene wear.
    Jaffe WL; Strauss EJ; Cardinale M; Herrera L; Kummer FJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 18848427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term outcome and risk factors of proximal femoral fracture in uncemented and cemented total hip arthroplasty in 2551 hips.
    Berend ME; Smith A; Meding JB; Ritter MA; Lynch T; Davis K
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):53-9. PubMed ID: 16950062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The case for cemented hips.
    Johnston RC
    Hip; 1987; ():351-9. PubMed ID: 3818353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comment on Breusch, S. J., Y. Draenert, K. Draenert: The anatomical basis of the cemented femoral stem. A comparative study of straight and anatomical design].
    Ochsner PE; Lützner J
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1999; 137(4):379. PubMed ID: 11051029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Surface cleaning of cemented orthopedic implants with conservation of surface properties].
    von Knoch M; von Knoch F
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002 Dec; 47(12):315-6. PubMed ID: 12585049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro long-term fatigue endurance of the secondary "Cement Injection Stem" hip prosthesis.
    Cristofolini L; Erani P; Grupp T; Jansson V; Viceconti M
    Artif Organs; 2007 Jun; 31(6):441-51. PubMed ID: 17537056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical comparison of 2 proximally coated femoral stems: effects of stem length and surface finish.
    Ong KL; Day JS; Manley MT; Kurtz SM; Geesink R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):819-24. PubMed ID: 18977636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cementation of a polyethylene liner into a metal acetabular shell: a biomechanical study.
    Hofmann AA; Prince EJ; Drake FT; Hunt KJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):775-82. PubMed ID: 18701253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessments of different kinds of stems by experiments and FEM analysis: appropriate stress distribution on a hip prosthesis.
    Sakai R; Itoman M; Mabuchi K
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Oct; 21(8):826-33. PubMed ID: 16701927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Biomechanical analysis of shaft construction of hip endoprostheses].
    Bettermann A; Ecke H; Nietert M; Mack E; Sablotzki A; Pape M
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1990; 35 Suppl 3():35-7. PubMed ID: 2078755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.