These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
793 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16627178)
1. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment. Angelieri F; Almeida RR; Almeida MR; Fuziy A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 16627178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance. Fuziy A; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Janson G; Angelieri F; Pinzan A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):502-10. PubMed ID: 17045150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum. Chiu PP; McNamara JA; Franchi L Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 16168332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment. Patel MP; Henriques JF; Freitas KM; Grec RH Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):44-51. PubMed ID: 25162565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion. de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; McNamara JA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):833-42. PubMed ID: 19962606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance. Bussick TJ; McNamara JA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 10715093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances. Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study. Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the effects produced by headgear and pendulum appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment. Angelieri F; de Almeida RR; Janson G; Castanha Henriques JF; Pinzan A Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):572-9. PubMed ID: 19054813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pendulum appliances with 2 anchorage designs: conventional anchorage vs bone anchorage. Polat-Ozsoy O; Kircelli BH; Arman-Ozçirpici A; Pektaş ZO; Uçkan S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):339.e9-339.e17. PubMed ID: 18331928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Noncompliance maxillary molar distalization with the first class appliance: a randomized controlled trial. Papadopoulos MA; Melkos AB; Athanasiou AE Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):586.e1-586.e13; discussion 586-7. PubMed ID: 20451774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maxillary molar distalization: Pendulum and Fast-Back, comparison between two approaches for Class II malocclusion. Caprioglio A; Beretta M; Lanteri C Prog Orthod; 2011; 12(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 21515227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distalization of maxillary molars with the bone-supported pendulum: a clinical study. Escobar SA; Tellez PA; Moncada CA; Villegas CA; Latorre CM; Oberti G Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4):545-9. PubMed ID: 17418723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage. Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Molar distalization with pendulum appliances in the mixed dentition: effects on the position of unerupted canines and premolars. Kinzinger GS; Wehrbein H; Gross U; Diedrich PR Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):407-17. PubMed ID: 16527638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes. Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination. Acar AG; Gürsoy S; Dinçer M Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods. Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance. Kircelli BH; Pektaş ZO; Kircelli C Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):650-9. PubMed ID: 16808573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]