247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16627203)
1. Consensus review: A method of assessment of calcifications that appropriately undergo a six-month follow-up.
Kuzmiak CM; Dancel R; Pisano E; Zeng D; Cole E; Koomen MA; McLelland R
Acad Radiol; 2006 May; 13(5):621-9. PubMed ID: 16627203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rates of presurgical underestimation of breast cancer after standardized assessment of breast calcifications.
Timpe L; Berkemeyer S; Puesken M; Tio J; Heindel W; Weigel S
Rofo; 2015 Jun; 187(6):445-9. PubMed ID: 25877994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Panizza P; Del Frate C; Soldano F; Isola M; Sardanelli F; Giuseppetti GM; Simonetti G; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increased breast calcifications in women with ESRD on dialysis: implications for breast cancer screening.
Castellanos M; Varma S; Ahern K; Grosso SJ; Buchbinder S; D'Angelo D; Raia C; Kleiner M; Elsayegh S
Am J Kidney Dis; 2006 Aug; 48(2):301-6. PubMed ID: 16860197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imaging Features of Patients Undergoing Active Surveillance for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.
Grimm LJ; Ghate SV; Hwang ES; Soo MS
Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1364-1371. PubMed ID: 28705686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Growth Dynamics of Mammographic Calcifications: Differentiating Ductal Carcinoma in Situ from Benign Breast Disease.
Grimm LJ; Miller MM; Thomas SM; Liu Y; Lo JY; Hwang ES; Hyslop T; Ryser MD
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 31112087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incidence of breast cancer in patients with pure flat epithelial atypia diagnosed at core-needle biopsy of the breast.
Khoumais NA; Scaranelo AM; Moshonov H; Kulkarni SR; Miller N; McCready DR; Youngson BJ; Crystal P; Done SJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):133-8. PubMed ID: 23064777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is the upgrade rate of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by core needle biopsy of calcifications different for digital and film-screen mammography?
McLaughlin CT; Neal CH; Helvie MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):917-22. PubMed ID: 25247961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-assisted analysis of mammographic clustered calcifications.
Freundlich IM; Hunter TB; Seeley GW; D'Orsi CJ; Sadowsky NL
Clin Radiol; 1989 May; 40(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 2752688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical biopsy is still necessary for BI-RADS 4 calcifications found on digital mammography that are technically too faint for stereotactic core biopsy.
Jeffries DO; Neal CH; Noroozian M; Joe AI; Pinsky RW; Goodsitt MM; Helvie MA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Dec; 154(3):557-61. PubMed ID: 26589316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk of upgrade of atypical ductal hyperplasia after stereotactic breast biopsy: effects of number of foci and complete removal of calcifications.
Kohr JR; Eby PR; Allison KH; DeMartini WB; Gutierrez RL; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2010 Jun; 255(3):723-30. PubMed ID: 20173103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Grouped Amorphous Calcifications at Mammography: Frequently Atypical but Rarely Associated with Aggressive Malignancy.
Oligane HC; Berg WA; Bandos AI; Chen SS; Sohrabi S; Anello M; Zuley ML
Radiology; 2018 Sep; 288(3):671-679. PubMed ID: 29916773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of the primary diagnosis with a CAD-system in mammography].
Malich A; Vogel D; Facius M; Marx C; Freesmeyer MG; Sauner D; Hansch A; Pfleiderer SO; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2003 Sep; 175(9):1225-31. PubMed ID: 12964078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography.
Vizcaíno I; Gadea L; Andreo L; Salas D; Ruiz-Perales F; Cuevas D; Herranz C; Bueno F;
Radiology; 2001 May; 219(2):475-83. PubMed ID: 11323475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Management of microcalcifications developing at the lumpectomy bed after conservative surgery and radiation therapy.
Günhan-Bilgen I; Oktay A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):393-8. PubMed ID: 17242247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Breast calcifications].
Villeirs G; Mortier M; De Potter C; Kunnen M
J Belge Radiol; 1995 Feb; 78(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 7890588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammographic analysis of calcifications.
Bassett LW
Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 1732937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calcifications of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Georgian-Smith D; Lawton TJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 May; 176(5):1255-9. PubMed ID: 11312190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mucocele-like lesions of the breast: a benign cause for indeterminate or suspicious mammographic microcalcifications.
Farshid G; Pieterse S; King JM; Robinson J
Breast J; 2005; 11(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 15647073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammographic morphology and distribution of calcifications in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed in organized screening.
Hofvind S; Iversen BF; Eriksen L; Styr BM; Kjellevold K; Kurz KD
Acta Radiol; 2011 Jun; 52(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 21498306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
