271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16627420)
1. Passive electrode effect reduces defibrillation threshold in bi-filament middle cardiac vein defibrillation.
Paisey JR; Yue AM; Bessoule F; Roberts PR; Morgan JM
Europace; 2006 Feb; 8(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 16627420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Examination of a middle cardiac vein defibrillation coil as stand-alone anode, auxiliary anode, and bystander electrode in a transvenous defibrillation circuit.
Paisey JR; Yue AM; Bessoule F; Allen S; Roberts PR; Morgan JM
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Aug; 27(8):1089-93. PubMed ID: 15305957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Estimation of defibrillation threshold using abdominally implanted cardioverter-defibrillator with an additional defibrillation pole in a dual-coil lead endocardial defibrillation system].
Pazdyga A; Lubiński A; Lewicka-Nowak E; Królak T; Kempa M; Zienciuk A; Raczak G
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2007 Feb; 22(128):86-9. PubMed ID: 17598649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of rapid biphasic shock subpulse switching on ventricular defibrillation thresholds.
Dosdall DJ; Rothe DE; Brandon TA; Sweeney JD
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 15(7):802-8. PubMed ID: 15250866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A multifilamented electrode in the middle cardiac vein reduces energy requirements for defibrillation in the pig.
Roberts PR; Allen S; Betts T; Urban JF; Euler DE; Crick S; Anderson RH; Kallok MJ; Morgan JM
Heart; 2000 Oct; 84(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 10995416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal electrode position for transvenous defibrillation: a prospective randomized study.
Stajduhar KC; Ott GY; Kron J; McAnulty JH; Oliver RP; Reynolds BT; Adler SW; Halperin BD
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Jan; 27(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 8522716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of defibrillation efficacy using implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with single- or dual-coil defibrillation leads and active can.
Lubiński A; Lewicka-Nowak E; Zienciuk A; Królak T; Kempa M; Pazdyga A; Raczak G; Swiatecka G
Kardiol Pol; 2005 Sep; 63(3):234-41; discussion 242-3. PubMed ID: 16180177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single capacitive discharge utilizing an auxiliary shock in the coronary venous system reduces the defibrillation threshold.
Roberts PR; Zhang Y; Zhuan S; Mowrey KA; Wallick DW; Hills DG; Betts TR; Allen S; Ewert J; Mazgalev TN; Morgan JM
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2001 Dec; 5(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 11752919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fractally coated defibrillation electrodes: is an improvement in defibrillation threshold possible?
Gradaus R; Böcker D; Dorszewski A; Lamp B; Hammel D; Breithardt G; Block M
Europace; 2000 Apr; 2(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 11225941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implantable intravascular defibrillator: evaluation of defibrillation waveforms with inferior vena cava electrode system.
Sanders WE; Malkin RA; Richey MW; Masson SC; Ransbury TJ; Urtz MW; Ideker RE
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2011 May; 34(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 21208244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reduction in defibrillation threshold using an auxiliary shock delivered in the middle cardiac vein.
Roberts PR; Urban JF; Betts T; Allen S; Dietz A; Euler DE; Whitman T; Kallok MJ; Morgan JM
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Aug; 23(8):1278-82. PubMed ID: 10962752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system.
Rashba EJ; Farasat M; Kirk MM; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):617-20. PubMed ID: 16836709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Implantation of defibrillators with transvenous-subcutaneous electrode systems].
Hief C; Podczeck A; Veit F; Frohner K; Kaltenbrunner W; Nürnberg M; Steinbach K
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1993; 105(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 8438594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The middle cardiac vein--a novel pathway to reduce the defibrillation threshold.
Roberts PR; Urban JF; Euler DE; Kallok MJ; Morgan JM
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Mar; 3(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 10354977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of shock polarity reversal on defibrillation threshold in an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
Zienciuk A; Lubiński A; Królak T; Lewicka-Nowak E; Kempa M; Pazdyga A; Raczak G
Kardiol Pol; 2007 May; 65(5):495-500; discussion 501-2. PubMed ID: 17577846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sequential pulse defibrillation for implantable defibrillators.
Bourland JD; Tacker WA; Wessale JL; Kallok MJ; Graf JE; Geddes LA
Med Instrum; 1986; 20(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 3724587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transvenous biventricular defibrillation.
Meisel E; Butter C; Philippon F; Higgins S; Strickberger SA; Smith J; Hahn S; Michel U; Schubert B; Pfeiffer D
Am J Cardiol; 2000 Nov; 86(9A):76K-85K. PubMed ID: 11084104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Novel electrode design for potentially painless internal defibrillation also allows for successful external defibrillation.
Jayanti V; Zviman MM; Nazarian S; Halperin HR; Berger RD
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 Sep; 18(10):1095-100. PubMed ID: 17711432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a novel ventricular support device with defibrillation capabilities in canine and porcine animal models.
Killingsworth CR; Rippy MK; Virmani R; Rollins DL; McGiffin DC; Ideker RE
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2008 Aug; 19(8):851-7. PubMed ID: 18373602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marked reduction of ventricular defibrillation threshold by application of an auxiliary shock to a catheter electrode in the left posterior coronary vein of dogs.
Kenknight BH; Walker RG; Ideker RE
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Aug; 11(8):900-6. PubMed ID: 10969753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
