297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16627443)
1. Role of ventricular Autocapture function in increasing longevity of DDDR pacemakers: a prospective study.
Boriani G; Rusconi L; Biffi M; Pavia L; Sassara M; Malfitano D; Bongiorni MG; Padeletti L; Filice I; Sanfelici D; Maffei P; Vicentini A; Branzi A
Europace; 2006 Mar; 8(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 16627443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of automatic threshold capture on pulse generator longevity.
Chen RH; Chen KP; Wang FZ; Hua W; Zhang S
Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Jun; 119(11):925-9. PubMed ID: 16780772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefits in projected pacemaker longevity and in pacing related costs conferred by automatic threshold tracking.
Boriani G; Biffi M; Branzi A; Mininno A; Sigliano R;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Nov; 23(11 Pt 2):1783-7. PubMed ID: 11139923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized study on the effects of pacemaker programming to a lower output on projected pulse generator longevity.
Schuchert A; Meinertz T;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug; 24(8 Pt 1):1234-9. PubMed ID: 11523609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term results of endocardial pacing with Autocapture threshold tracking pacemakers in children.
Celiker A; Ceviz N; Küçükosmanoğlu O
Europace; 2005 Nov; 7(6):569-75. PubMed ID: 16216759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pacing with capture verification in candidates for resynchronisation therapy: a feasibility study.
Biffi M; Boriani G; Bertini M; Silvestri P; Martignani C; Branzi A
Europace; 2005 May; 7(3):255-65. PubMed ID: 15878565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimizing pacemaker longevity with pacing mode and settings programming: results from a pacemaker multicenter registry.
Benkemoun H; Sacrez J; Lagrange P; Amiel A; Prakash A; Himmrich E; Aimè E; Mairesse GH; Guénon C; Sbragia P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Apr; 35(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 22309354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A cardiac evoked response algorithm providing automatic threshold tracking for continuous capture verification: a single-center prospective study.
Verma PK; Sharma JK; Khan IA; Bali HK; Varma JS; Bhargava M; Sharma YP; Grover A
Indian Heart J; 2001; 53(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 11759937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrical performance and automatic capture characteristics of a 3.5-mm(2) passive fixation lead during 1-year follow-up.
Lotze U; Fischer S; Höfs T; Liebetrau J; Fettin W; Scheiner J; Lang A;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Aug; 32(8):1050-5. PubMed ID: 19659625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Telemetry guided pacemaker programming: impact of output amplitude and the use of low threshold leads on projected pacemaker longevity.
Schwaab B; Fröhlig G; Schwerdt H; Heisel A; Berg M; Schieffer H
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Nov; 21(11 Pt 1):2055-63. PubMed ID: 9826856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Left ventricular pacing by automatic capture verification.
Biffi M; Bertini M; Ziacchi M; Boriani G
Europace; 2007 Dec; 9(12):1177-81. PubMed ID: 17932022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Percent ventricular pacing with managed ventricular pacing mode in standard pacemaker population.
Milasinovic G; Tscheliessnigg K; Boehmer A; Vancura V; Schuchert A; Brandt J; Wiggenhorn C; Hofman M; Sperzel J
Europace; 2008 Feb; 10(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 18203737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of short pulse width programming in AutoCapture devices.
Kok LC; Hanna GP; Brownstein S; Kim M; Levine PA; Vijayaraman P; Go A; Syed ZA
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Jan; 28 Suppl 1():S70-2. PubMed ID: 15683530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A new cardiac pacemaker stimulation technology (autocapture) allows, with unchanged life expectancy, reduction of generator size by half].
Antretter H; Bonatti J; Cottogni M; Hangler H; Müller LC; Mair P; Dapunt OE
Acta Med Austriaca; 1996; 23(5):159-64. PubMed ID: 9082745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term follow-up of pacemakers with an Autocapture pacing system.
Erdinler I; Akyol A; Okmen E; Oguz E; Gurkan K; Ulufer T
Jpn Heart J; 2002 Nov; 43(6):631-41. PubMed ID: 12558127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automatic adjustment of pacing output in the clinical setting.
Ribeiro AL; Rincón LG; Oliveira BG; Vinha CR; Melatto D; Torres AA; Barros VC; Levine PA
Am Heart J; 2004 Jan; 147(1):127-31. PubMed ID: 14691430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ventricular capture management in pediatric pacing: efficacy and safety.
Silvetti MS; De Santis A; Grutter G; Di Ciommo V; Drago F
Ital Heart J; 2005 Sep; 6(9):751-6. PubMed ID: 16212078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Use of dual-chamber pacemaker. Short and long-term results].
Dubernet J; Fajuri A; Acevedo M; González JA; Maturana G; Zalaquett R; Garrido L; De la Paz F; Casanegra P
Rev Med Chil; 1999 Mar; 127(3):309-18. PubMed ID: 10436715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Limitations of the AutoCapture™ Pacing System in patients with cardiac stimulation devices.
Benezet-Mazuecos J; Iglesias JA; Rubio JM; Cortés M; de la Cruz E; de la Vieja JJ; Calle S; Farré J
Europace; 2014 Oct; 16(10):1469-75. PubMed ID: 24789975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term experience with AutoCapture-controlled epicardial pacing in children.
Tomaske M; Harpes P; Pretre R; Dodge-Khatami A; Bauersfeld U
Europace; 2007 Aug; 9(8):645-50. PubMed ID: 17630391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
