BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16627519)

  • 1. Reporting attrition in randomised controlled trials.
    Dumville JC; Torgerson DJ; Hewitt CE
    BMJ; 2006 Apr; 332(7547):969-71. PubMed ID: 16627519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiplicity in oncology randomised controlled trials: a threat to medical evidence?
    Prasad V; Booth CM
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Dec; 20(12):1638-1640. PubMed ID: 31797779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attrition in randomized controlled clinical trials: methodological issues in psychopharmacology.
    Leon AC; Mallinckrodt CH; Chuang-Stein C; Archibald DG; Archer GE; Chartier K
    Biol Psychiatry; 2006 Jun; 59(11):1001-5. PubMed ID: 16503329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity.
    Fujii Y
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Jun; 67(6):669-70; author reply 670. PubMed ID: 22512837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Introduction to randomized trials: attrition bias].
    Simon EG; Fouché CJ; Perrotin F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Jan; 40(1):64-5. PubMed ID: 22192692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Describing the participants in a study.
    Pickering RM
    Age Ageing; 2017 Jul; 46(4):576-581. PubMed ID: 28472376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dropouts and missing data in psychiatric clinical trials.
    Potkin SG; Siu CO
    Am J Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 166(11):1295; author reply 1295-6. PubMed ID: 19884237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies?
    Fewtrell MS; Kennedy K; Singhal A; Martin RM; Ness A; Hadders-Algra M; Koletzko B; Lucas A
    Arch Dis Child; 2008 Jun; 93(6):458-61. PubMed ID: 18495909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association between bibliometric parameters, reporting and methodological quality of randomised controlled trials in vascular and endovascular surgery.
    Hajibandeh S; Hajibandeh S; Antoniou GA; Green PA; Maden M; Torella F
    Vascular; 2017 Apr; 25(2):196-207. PubMed ID: 27252347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Introducing the new CONSORT extension for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.
    Hemming K; Taljaard M; Grimshaw J
    Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):68. PubMed ID: 30658677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis and reporting of stepped wedge randomised controlled trials: synthesis and critical appraisal of published studies, 2010 to 2014.
    Davey C; Hargreaves J; Thompson JA; Copas AJ; Beard E; Lewis JJ; Fielding KL
    Trials; 2015 Aug; 16():358. PubMed ID: 26278667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level.
    Rombach I; Gray AM; Jenkinson C; Murray DW; Rivero-Arias O
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):87. PubMed ID: 30153796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of randomized controlled trials.
    Stanley K
    Circulation; 2007 Apr; 115(13):1819-22. PubMed ID: 17404173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement.
    Kane RL; Wang J; Garrard J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 60(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 17292017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On statistical methods to test if sampling in trials is genuinely random.
    Pandit JJ
    Anaesthesia; 2012 May; 67(5):456-462. PubMed ID: 22404285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of data integrity.
    McCann JC; Hudes ML; Ames BN
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Sep; 67(9):1042-3. PubMed ID: 22861504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials.
    Walker A; Nixon J
    J Wound Care; 2004 Mar; 13(3):103-6. PubMed ID: 15045804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lies, damn lies, and statistics.
    Yentis SM
    Anaesthesia; 2012 May; 67(5):455-456. PubMed ID: 22404377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Missing data in rheumatologic studies and the practical reality of modern approaches to the analysis of incomplete subject data: comment on the article by Baron et al and the editorial by Boers.
    Steele R; Hudson M
    Arthritis Rheum; 2008 Sep; 59(9):1367-8. PubMed ID: 18759312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomisation and baseline comparisons in clinical trials.
    Altman DG; Doré CJ
    Lancet; 1990 Jan; 335(8682):149-53. PubMed ID: 1967441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.