These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16627519)
61. Sample size determination and statistical power in randomized controlled trials. Sjögren P; Hedström L Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):652-3. PubMed ID: 20416528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. Trimmed means for symptom trials with dropouts. Permutt T; Li F Pharm Stat; 2017 Jan; 16(1):20-28. PubMed ID: 27523396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Clinical trials--multiple treatments, multiple end points, and multiple lessons. Lauer MS; Topol EJ JAMA; 2003 May; 289(19):2575-7. PubMed ID: 12759328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Quality of Intervention Reporting in Randomized Clinical Trials Published in Urology Journals. Johnson BS; Fladie I; Jellison S; McMurray M; Narayan V; Vassar M Eur Urol; 2020 Mar; 77(3):296-298. PubMed ID: 31733989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Safety reporting in randomized trials of mental health interventions. Papanikolaou PN; Churchill R; Wahlbeck K; Ioannidis JP Am J Psychiatry; 2004 Sep; 161(9):1692-7. PubMed ID: 15337661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Longitudinal studies in rheumatology: some guidance for analysis. Lesaffre E Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2012; 70(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 22891996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Designing randomised trials: both large and small trials are needed. Stenning SP; Parmar MK Ann Oncol; 2002; 13 Suppl 4():131-8. PubMed ID: 12401679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Is Propensity Score Analysis a Valid Surrogate of Randomization for the Avoidance of Allocation Bias? Torres F; Ríos J; Saez-Peñataro J; Pontes C Semin Liver Dis; 2017 Aug; 37(3):275-286. PubMed ID: 28847037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. The clinician as investigator: participating in clinical trials in the practice setting: Appendix 1: fundamentals of study design. Lader EW; Cannon CP; Ohman EM; Newby LK; Sulmasy DP; Barst RJ; Fair JM; Flather M; Freedman JE; Frye RL; Hand MM; Jesse RL; Van de Werf F; Costa F; Circulation; 2004 Jun; 109(21):e302-4. PubMed ID: 15173052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. The design and use of cluster randomised controlled trials in evaluating injury prevention interventions: part 1. Rationale, design and informed consent. DiGuiseppi C; Coupland C Inj Prev; 2010 Feb; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 20179039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. Randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery: survey of output and quality of reporting. Yeow VK; Lee ST; Cheng JJ; Koh A; Wong HB; Machin D J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(8):965-6. PubMed ID: 17616372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. To randomise or not to randomise: methodological pitfalls of the RCT design in psychosocial intervention studies. Bottomley A Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 1997 Sep; 6(3):222-30. PubMed ID: 9335674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: review of recent trials published in three general medical journals. Puffer S; Torgerson D; Watson J BMJ; 2003 Oct; 327(7418):785-9. PubMed ID: 14525877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Potential pitfalls in the design and reporting of clinical trials. Sydes MR; Langley RE Lancet Oncol; 2010 Jul; 11(7):694-700. PubMed ID: 20537947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]