137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16627562)
21. Real-time monitoring of aRNA production during T7 amplification to prevent the loss of sample representation during microarray hybridization sample preparation.
Gilbert I; Scantland S; Dufort I; Gordynska O; Labbe A; Sirard MA; Robert C
Nucleic Acids Res; 2009 May; 37(8):e65. PubMed ID: 19336411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data using amplified RNA.
Cope L; Hartman SM; Göhlmann HW; Tiesman JP; Irizarry RA
Biotechniques; 2006 Feb; 40(2):165-6, 168, 170. PubMed ID: 16526405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Microarray amplification bias: loss of 30% differentially expressed genes due to long probe - poly(A)-tail distances.
Boelens MC; te Meerman GJ; Gibcus JH; Blokzijl T; Boezen HM; Timens W; Postma DS; Groen HJ; van den Berg A
BMC Genomics; 2007 Aug; 8():277. PubMed ID: 17697374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Single-stranded linear amplification protocol results in reproducible and reliable microarray data from nanogram amounts of starting RNA.
Stirewalt DL; Pogosova-Agadjanyan EL; Khalid N; Hare DR; Ladne PA; Sala-Torra O; Zhao LP; Radich JP
Genomics; 2004 Feb; 83(2):321-31. PubMed ID: 14706461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Microarray-based comparison of three amplification methods for nanogram amounts of total RNA.
Singh R; Maganti RJ; Jabba SV; Wang M; Deng G; Heath JD; Kurn N; Wangemann P
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol; 2005 May; 288(5):C1179-89. PubMed ID: 15613496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of RNA amplification methods and chip platforms for microarray analysis of samples processed by laser capture microdissection.
Caretti E; Devarajan K; Coudry R; Ross E; Clapper ML; Cooper HS; Bellacosa A
J Cell Biochem; 2008 Feb; 103(2):556-63. PubMed ID: 17546586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Probe generation directly from small numbers of cells for DNA microarray studies.
Xiang CC; Chen M; Kozhich OA; Phan QN; Inman JM; Chen Y; Brownstein MJ
Biotechniques; 2003 Feb; 34(2):386-8, 390, 392-3. PubMed ID: 12613261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biologically relevant effects of mRNA amplification on gene expression profiles.
van Haaften RI; Schroen B; Janssen BJ; van Erk A; Debets JJ; Smeets HJ; Smits JF; van den Wijngaard A; Pinto YM; Evelo CT
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Apr; 7():200. PubMed ID: 16608515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Advantages of mRNA amplification for microarray analysis.
Feldman AL; Costouros NG; Wang E; Qian M; Marincola FM; Alexander HR; Libutti SK
Biotechniques; 2002 Oct; 33(4):906-12, 914. PubMed ID: 12398200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Amplification of low quantity bacterial RNA for microarray studies: time-course analysis of Leptospirillum ferrooxidans under nitrogen-fixing conditions.
Moreno-Paz M; Parro V
Environ Microbiol; 2006 Jun; 8(6):1064-73. PubMed ID: 16689727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Improved genome-wide localization by ChIP-chip using double-round T7 RNA polymerase-based amplification.
van Bakel H; van Werven FJ; Radonjic M; Brok MO; van Leenen D; Holstege FC; Timmers HT
Nucleic Acids Res; 2008 Mar; 36(4):e21. PubMed ID: 18180247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fidelity and enhanced sensitivity of differential transcription profiles following linear amplification of nanogram amounts of endothelial mRNA.
Polacek DC; Passerini AG; Shi C; Francesco NM; Manduchi E; Grant GR; Powell S; Bischof H; Winkler H; Stoeckert CJ; Davies PF
Physiol Genomics; 2003 Apr; 13(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 12700361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of RNA amplification techniques meeting the demands for the expression profiling of clinical cancer samples.
Lauss M; Vierlinger K; Weinhaeusel A; Szameit S; Kaserer K; Noehammer C
Virchows Arch; 2007 Dec; 451(6):1019-29. PubMed ID: 17972098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. cRNA target preparation for microarrays: comparison of gene expression profiles generated with different amplification procedures.
Schindler H; Wiese A; Auer J; Burtscher H
Anal Biochem; 2005 Sep; 344(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 16038869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Amplified RNA degradation in T7-amplification methods results in biased microarray hybridizations.
Spiess AN; Mueller N; Ivell R
BMC Genomics; 2003 Nov; 4(1):44. PubMed ID: 14606961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. An evaluation of linear RNA amplification in cDNA microarray gene expression analysis.
Zhu B; Xu F; Baba Y
Mol Genet Metab; 2006 Jan; 87(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 16214384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Optimization of T7-based RNA amplification system for cDNA microarray].
Li T; Li Y; Han ZY; Chen Q; Qiu MY; Ni S; Jiang ZL; Xie Y; Mao YM
Sheng Wu Hua Xue Yu Sheng Wu Wu Li Xue Bao (Shanghai); 2003 May; 35(5):441-8. PubMed ID: 12766805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Single-cell laser-capture microdissection and RNA amplification.
Kamme F; Zhu J; Luo L; Yu J; Tran DT; Meurers B; Bittner A; Westlund K; Carlton S; Wan J
Methods Mol Med; 2004; 99():215-23. PubMed ID: 15131340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Optimized RNA amplification using T7-RNA-polymerase based in vitro transcription.
Moll PR; Duschl J; Richter K
Anal Biochem; 2004 Nov; 334(1):164-74. PubMed ID: 15464965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Design of a real time quantitative PCR assay to assess global mRNA amplification of small size specimens for microarray hybridisation.
Choesmel V; Foucault F; Thiery JP; Blin N
J Clin Pathol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1278-87. PubMed ID: 15563668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
