116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16628034)
1. Volumetric analysis of liver metastases in computed tomography with the fuzzy C-means algorithm.
Yim PJ; Vora AV; Raghavan D; Prasad R; McAullife M; Ohman-Strickland P; Nosher JL
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2006; 30(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 16628034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel fuzzy C-means algorithm for unsupervised heterogeneous tumor quantification in PET.
Belhassen S; Zaidi H
Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1309-24. PubMed ID: 20384268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Volumetric measurement of hepatic tumors: Accuracy of manual contouring using CT with volumetric pathology as the reference method.
Pupulim LF; Ronot M; Paradis V; Chemouny S; Vilgrain V
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2018 Feb; 99(2):83-89. PubMed ID: 29221936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual-energy CT in patients with colorectal cancer: Improved assessment of hypoattenuating liver metastases using noise-optimized virtual monoenergetic imaging.
Lenga L; Czwikla R; Wichmann JL; Leithner D; Albrecht MH; Booz C; Arendt CT; Yel I; D'Angelo T; Vogl TJ; Martin SS
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():184-191. PubMed ID: 30150043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Volume measurement of liver metastases using multidetector computed tomography: comparison of lesion diameter and volume segmentation - a phantom study.
Rothe JH; Steffen IG; Lehmkuhl L; Grieser C; Mussler A; Schnapauff D; Stelter L; Denecke T
Rofo; 2010 Dec; 182(12):1082-90. PubMed ID: 21104596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images.
Chen W; Giger ML; Bick U
Acad Radiol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 16399033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved R2* liver iron concentration assessment using a novel fuzzy c-mean clustering scheme.
Saiviroonporn P; Viprakasit V; Krittayaphong R
BMC Med Imaging; 2015 Nov; 15():52. PubMed ID: 26530825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Suitability of semi-automated tumor response assessment of liver metastases using a dedicated software package.
Kalkmann J; Ladd SC; de Greiff A; Forsting M; Stattaus J
Rofo; 2010 Jul; 182(7):581-8. PubMed ID: 20419616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hepatic tumors: region-of-interest versus volumetric analysis for quantification of attenuation at CT.
Chalian H; Tochetto SM; Töre HG; Rezai P; Yaghmai V
Radiology; 2012 Mar; 262(3):853-61. PubMed ID: 22357887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Size determination and response assessment of liver metastases with computed tomography--comparison of RECIST and volumetric algorithms.
Rothe JH; Grieser C; Lehmkuhl L; Schnapauff D; Fernandez CP; Maurer MH; Mussler A; Hamm B; Denecke T; Steffen IG
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):1831-9. PubMed ID: 22717124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D Liver Tumor Segmentation in CT Images Using Improved Fuzzy
Wu W; Wu S; Zhou Z; Zhang R; Zhang Y
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():5207685. PubMed ID: 29090220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An improved fuzzy-differential evolution approach applied to classification of tumors in liver CT scan images.
AmirHosseini B; Hosseini R
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Oct; 57(10):2277-2287. PubMed ID: 31418157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SPEQTACLE: An automated generalized fuzzy C-means algorithm for tumor delineation in PET.
Lapuyade-Lahorgue J; Visvikis D; Pradier O; Cheze Le Rest C; Hatt M
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5720-34. PubMed ID: 26429246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Semiautomated versus manual evaluation of liver metastases treated by radiofrequency ablation.
Keil S; Bruners P; Ohnsorge L; Plumhans C; Behrendt FF; Stanzel S; Sühling M; Günther RW; Das M; Mahnken AH
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 20123208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CT liver tumor segmentation hybrid approach using neutrosophic sets, fast fuzzy c-means and adaptive watershed algorithm.
Anter AM; Hassenian AE
Artif Intell Med; 2019 Jun; 97():105-117. PubMed ID: 30558825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advanced virtual monoenergetic computed tomography of hyperattenuating and hypoattenuating liver lesions: ex-vivo and patient experience in various body sizes.
Husarik DB; Gordic S; Desbiolles L; Krauss B; Leschka S; Wildermuth S; Alkadhi H
Invest Radiol; 2015 Oct; 50(10):695-702. PubMed ID: 26002623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Semi-automatic software increases CT measurement accuracy but not response classification of colorectal liver metastases after chemotherapy.
van Kessel CS; van Leeuwen MS; Witteveen PO; Kwee TC; Verkooijen HM; van Hillegersberg R
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2543-9. PubMed ID: 22264447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of Radiation Dose Reduction and Reconstruction Algorithm on Image Noise, Contrast, Resolution, and Detectability of Subtle Hypoattenuating Liver Lesions at Multidetector CT: Filtered Back Projection versus a Commercial Model-based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm.
Solomon J; Marin D; Roy Choudhury K; Patel B; Samei E
Radiology; 2017 Sep; 284(3):777-787. PubMed ID: 28170300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Volumetric evaluation of hepatic tumors: multi-vendor, multi-reader liver phantom study.
Lubner MG; Dustin Pooler B; del Rio AM; Durkee B; Pickhardt PJ
Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):488-96. PubMed ID: 24492936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
