These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16628387)

  • 1. ROC analysis for diagnostic accuracy of fracture by using different monitors.
    Liang Z; Li K; Yang X; Du X; Liu J; Zhao X; Qi X
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Sep; 19(3):276-8. PubMed ID: 16628387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of subtle pulmonary disease on CR chest images: monochromatic CRT monitor vs color CRT monitor.
    Iwano S; Ishigaki T; Shimamoto K; Inamura K; Maeda T; Ikeda M; Ishiguchi T; Kozuka T
    Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 11194919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The study of diagnostic accuracy of chest nodules by using different compression methods.
    Zhigang L; Kuncheng LI; Jinghong Z; Shuliang L
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Aug; 55(2):255-7. PubMed ID: 16036156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of interstitial lung abnormalities on picture archive and communication system video monitors.
    Washowich TL; Williams SC; Richardson LA; Simmons GE; Dao NV; Allen TW; Hammet GC; Morris MJ
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Feb; 10(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 9147526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Personal computer versus workstation display: observer performance in detection of wrist fractures on digital radiographs.
    Doyle AJ; Le Fevre J; Anderson GD
    Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):872-7. PubMed ID: 16237135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of lossy discrete cosine transform compression on subtle bone fractures.
    Toney MO; Dominguez R; Dao HN; Simmons G
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Nov; 10(4):169-73. PubMed ID: 9399170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of computer display monitors for computed radiography diagnostic application in a radiology PACS.
    Sim L; Manthey K; Esdaile P; Benson M
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2004 Sep; 27(3):148-50. PubMed ID: 15580844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) software for the detection of lung nodules on multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT): JAFROC study for the improvement in radiologists' diagnostic accuracy.
    Hirose T; Nitta N; Shiraishi J; Nagatani Y; Takahashi M; Murata K
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1505-12. PubMed ID: 19000867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a digital workstation for interpreting neonatal examinations. A receiver operating characteristic study.
    Franken EA; Berbaum KS; Marley SM; Smith WL; Sato Y; Kao SC; Milam SG
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Sep; 27(9):732-7. PubMed ID: 1399457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Performance study of teleradiology network systems with CRT monitors: ROC analysis of an observation study of simulated lung nodules].
    Takizawa M; Sone S; Oguchi K; Maruyama Y; Watanabe T; Gomi K; Wako T; Okazaki Y; Momose M; Imai S; Maruyama A; Sakai F
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Dec; 56(14):1061-5. PubMed ID: 9014469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subtle orthopedic fractures: teleradiology workstation versus film interpretation.
    Scott WW; Rosenbaum JE; Ackerman SJ; Reichle RL; Magid D; Weller JC; Gitlin JN
    Radiology; 1993 Jun; 187(3):811-5. PubMed ID: 8497636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture interpretation using electronic presentation: a comparison.
    Bancroft LW; Berquist TH; Morin RL; Pietan JH; Knudsen JM; Williams HJ
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 Feb; 13(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 10696596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of two data analyses from two observer performance studies using Jackknife ROC and JAFROC.
    Zheng B; Chakraborty DP; Rockette HE; Maitz GS; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1031-4. PubMed ID: 15895587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of performance of computer display monitors for radiological diagnosis; "diagnostic" high brightness monochrome LCD, 3MP vs "clinical review" colour LCD, 2MP.
    Sim L; Manthey K; Stuckey S
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2007 Jun; 30(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 17682398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.
    Gur D; Abrams GS; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Perrin RL; Rathfon GY; Sumkin JH; Zuley ML; Bandos AI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Aug; 193(2):586-91. PubMed ID: 19620460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The detectability of osteoarticular lesions of the extremities on the television monitor].
    Salvini E; Zincone G; Macchi I; Mariani AM; Crespi A; Paruccini N
    Radiol Med; 1994 Apr; 87(4):401-4. PubMed ID: 8190921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpretation of Emergency Department radiographs: a comparison of emergency medicine physicians with radiologists, residents with faculty, and film with digital display.
    Eng J; Mysko WK; Weller GE; Renard R; Gitlin JN; Bluemke DA; Magid D; Kelen GD; Scott WW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Nov; 175(5):1233-8. PubMed ID: 11044013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. LCD versus CRT monitors for digital mammography: a comparison of observer performance for the detection of clustered microcalcifications and masses.
    Cha JH; Moon WK; Cho N; Lee EH; Park JS; Jang MJ
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1104-8. PubMed ID: 19922305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digitized radiographs in skeletal trauma: a performance comparison between a digital workstation and the original film images.
    Wilson AJ; Hodge JC
    Radiology; 1995 Aug; 196(2):565-8. PubMed ID: 7617878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.