242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16628656)
1. The PapSpin: a reasonable alternative to other, more expensive liquid-based Papanicolaou tests.
Rosenthal DL; Geddes S; Trimble CL; Carson KA; Alli PM
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 108(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 16628656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the SurePath liquid-based Papanicolaou smear with the conventional Papanicolaou smear in a multisite direct-to-vial study.
Fremont-Smith M; Marino J; Griffin B; Spencer L; Bolick D
Cancer; 2004 Oct; 102(5):269-79. PubMed ID: 15386329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The significance of the Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Nasser SM; Cibas ES; Crum CP; Faquin WC
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 14579293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distribution of human papillomavirus types in ThinPrep Papanicolaou tests classified according to the Bethesda 2001 terminology and correlations with patient age and biopsy outcomes.
Evans MF; Adamson CS; Papillo JL; St John TL; Leiman G; Cooper K
Cancer; 2006 Mar; 106(5):1054-64. PubMed ID: 16421920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of two tests for detecting carcinogenic HPV in women with Papanicolaou smear reports of ASCUS and LSIL.
Ferris DG; Wright TC; Litaker MS; Richart RM; Lorincz AT; Sun XW; Woodward L
J Fam Pract; 1998 Feb; 46(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9487319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative methylation-specific PCR for the detection of aberrant DNA methylation in liquid-based Pap tests.
Kahn SL; Ronnett BM; Gravitt PE; Gustafson KS
Cancer; 2008 Feb; 114(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18181097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears.
Guo M; Hu L; Martin L; Liu S; Baliga M; Hughson MD
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15839615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in the management of women with abnormal Pap smears. Experience of a colposcopy referral clinic.
Ciotti M; Sesti F; Paba P; Benedetto A; Patrizi L; Criscuolo A; Piccione E; Branca M; Syrjänen K; Favalli C
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2004; 25(5):577-84. PubMed ID: 15493169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The significance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" as a distinct squamous abnormality category in Papanicolaou tests.
Elsheikh TM; Kirkpatrick JL; Wu HH
Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):277-81. PubMed ID: 16937376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on Papanicolaou test: follow-up rates and stratification of risk for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Rufail M; Lew M; Pang J; Jing X; Heider A; Cantley RL
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(4):258-265. PubMed ID: 32402830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does the interval between papanicolaou tests influence the quality of cytology?
Jeronimo J; Khan MJ; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Cancer; 2005 Jun; 105(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 15822121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utility of p16 Immunohistochemistry in Evaluating Negative Cervical Biopsies Following High-risk Pap Test Results.
Shain AF; Kwok S; Folkins AK; Kong CS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Jan; 42(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29112019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of conventional and liquid-based Pap smear methods in the diagnosis of precancerous cervical lesions.
Honarvar Z; Zarisfi Z; Salari Sedigh S; Masoumi Shahrbabak M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Aug; 42(6):2320-2324. PubMed ID: 35579303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prevalence of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and invasive cervical cancer in patients with low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) at cervical pap smear.
Khuakoonratt N; Tangjitgamol S; Manusirivithaya S; Khunnarong J; Pataradule K; Thavaramara T; Suekwattana P
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2008; 9(2):253-7. PubMed ID: 18712968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Women's triage and management preferences for cervical cytologic reports demonstrating atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Ferris DG; Kriegel D; Cote L; Litaker M; Woodward L
Arch Fam Med; 1997; 6(4):348-53. PubMed ID: 9225706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality metrics in cervical cytopathology: A single institutional study.
Senthil Kumar D; Ravikumar G
Cytopathology; 2022 Mar; 33(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 34854153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Shandon PapSpin liquid-based gynecological test: A split-sample and direct-to-vial test with histology follow-up study.
Rimiene J; Petronyte J; Gudleviciene Z; Smailyte G; Krasauskaite I; Laurinavicius A
Cytojournal; 2010 Mar; 7():2. PubMed ID: 20376176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of Pap Test terminology and age in the detection of carcinoma invasive and carcinoma in situ in medically underserved California women.
Howell LP; Tabnak F; Tudury AJ; Stoodt G
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 15048955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histopathologic follow-up and human papillomavirus DNA test results in 290 patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Papanicolaou test results.
Gao FF; Austin RM; Zhao C
Cancer Cytopathol; 2011 Dec; 119(6):377-86. PubMed ID: 21774093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical parakeratosis/hyperkeratosis as an important cause for false negative results of Pap smear and human papillomavirus test.
Xiao GQ; Emanuel PO
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Jun; 49(3):302-6. PubMed ID: 19566565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
