These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16628943)

  • 1. Effect of natural windbreaks on drift reduction in orchard spraying.
    Wenneker M; Heijne B; van de Zande JC
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):961-9. PubMed ID: 16628943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Windbreaks as a pesticide drift mitigation strategy: a review.
    Ucar T; Hall FR
    Pest Manag Sci; 2001 Aug; 57(8):663-75. PubMed ID: 11517719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wind tunnel studies on spray deposition on leaves of tree species used for windbreaks and exposure of honey bees.
    Ucar T; Hall FR; Tew JE; Hacker JK
    Pest Manag Sci; 2003 Mar; 59(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 12639055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 4: a comparative study.
    Nuyttens D; Baetens K; De Schampheleire M; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):769-74. PubMed ID: 19226827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 3: field drift experiments.
    Nuyttens D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Dekeyser D; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):763-7. PubMed ID: 19226826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 2: wind tunnel experiments.
    Nuyttens D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):757-61. PubMed ID: 19226825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Buffer zones for reducing pesticide drift to ditches and risks to aquatic organisms.
    de Snoo GR; de Wit PJ
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1998 Sep; 41(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 9756699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spray drift as affected by meteorological conditions.
    Nuyttens D; Sonck B; de Schampheleire M; Steurbaut W; Baetens K; Verboven P; Nicolaï B; Ramon H
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):947-59. PubMed ID: 16628942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Drift studies--comparison of field and wind tunnel experiments.
    Stadler R; Regenauer W
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):971-3. PubMed ID: 16628944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interception of spray drift by border structures. Part 2: field experiments.
    De Schampheleire M; Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; Verboven P; Spanoghe P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):723-7. PubMed ID: 19226820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of air support on droplet characteristics and spray drift.
    Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2007; 72(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 18399426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The efficiency of drift-reducing measures to protect the Flemish environment.
    De Schampheleire M; Spanoghe P; Nuyttens D; Baetens K; Cornelis W; Gabriels D
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 17191485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of the entrained air and initial droplet velocity on the release height parameter of a Gaussian spray drift model.
    Stainier C; Destain MF; Schiffers B; Lebeau F
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):197-200. PubMed ID: 17390793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interception of spray drift by border structures. Part 1: wind tunnel experiments.
    De Schampheleire M; Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; Verboven P; Cornelis W; Gabriels D; Spanoghe P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):719-22. PubMed ID: 19226819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Buffer zone and windbreak effects on spray drift deposition in a simulated wetland.
    Brown RB; Carter MH; Stephenson GR
    Pest Manag Sci; 2004 Nov; 60(11):1085-90. PubMed ID: 15532682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Classification of spray nozzles based on droplet size distributions and wind tunnel tests.
    De Schamphelerie M; Spanoghe P; Nuyttens D; Baetens K; Cornelis W; Gabriels D; Van der Meeren P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):201-7. PubMed ID: 17390794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The assessment of spray drift damage for ten major crops in Belgium.
    de Schampheleire M; Spanoghe P; Steurbaut W; Nuyttens D; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):1037-42. PubMed ID: 16628952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of realtime spray drift using RTDrift Gaussian advection-diffusion model.
    Lebeau F; Verstraete A; Schiffers B; Destain MF
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 20218507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A pdpa laser-based measuring set-up for the characterisation of spray nozzles.
    Nuyttens D; Sonck B; de Schampheleire M; Steurbaut W; Baetens K; Verboven P; Nicolaï B; Ramon H
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):1023-35. PubMed ID: 16628951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of pesticide emission fluxes from canopy using micrometeorological methods.
    De Backer E; Samson R; Steurbaut W
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 17191484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.