These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16629006)

  • 1. Staging workers' use of hearing protection devices: application of the transtheoretical model.
    Raymond DM; Lusk SL
    AAOHN J; 2006 Apr; 54(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 16629006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noise and hearing protection: Latino construction workers' experiences.
    Robertson C; Kerr M; Garcia C; Halterman E
    AAOHN J; 2007 Apr; 55(4):153-60. PubMed ID: 17472130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing decisional balance and self-efficacy applied to workers' use of hearing protection.
    Raymond DM; Lusk SL
    Nurs Res; 2006; 55(5):328-35. PubMed ID: 16980833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Explaining Mexican American workers' hearing protection use with the health promotion model.
    Kerr MJ; Lusk SL; Ronis DL
    Nurs Res; 2002; 51(2):100-9. PubMed ID: 11984380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Test of the health promotion model as a causal model of construction workers' use of hearing protection.
    Lusk SL; Ronis DL; Hogan MM
    Res Nurs Health; 1997 Jun; 20(3):183-94. PubMed ID: 9179173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting use of hearing protection: a preliminary study.
    Lusk SL; Kelemen MJ
    Public Health Nurs; 1993 Sep; 10(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 8234157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of a tailored intervention to increase factory workers' use of hearing protection.
    Lusk SL; Ronis DL; Kazanis AS; Eakin BL; Hong O; Raymond DM
    Nurs Res; 2003; 52(5):289-95. PubMed ID: 14501543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors affecting Thai workers' use of hearing protection.
    Tantranont K; Srisuphan W; Kaewthummanukul T; Suthakorn W; Jormsri P; Salazar MK
    AAOHN J; 2009 Nov; 57(11):455-63. PubMed ID: 19873942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Test of the Health Promotion Model as a causal model of workers' use of hearing protection.
    Lusk SL; Ronis DL; Kerr MJ; Atwood JR
    Nurs Res; 1994; 43(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 8183656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of technology-based interventions to increase the use of hearing protections among adolescent farmworkers.
    Khan KM; Evans SS; Bielko SL; Rohlman DS
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Feb; 57(2):124-134. PubMed ID: 28918682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethnic differences in predictors of hearing protection behavior between Black and White workers.
    Hong O; Lusk SL; Ronis DL
    Res Theory Nurs Pract; 2005; 19(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 15989167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beliefs and attitudes among Swedish workers regarding the risk of hearing loss.
    Svensson EB; Morata TC; Nylén P; Krieg EF; Johnson AC
    Int J Audiol; 2004; 43(10):585-93. PubMed ID: 15724523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors influencing use of hearing protection among farmers: a test of the pender health promotion model.
    McCullagh M; Lusk SL; Ronis DL
    Nurs Res; 2002; 51(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 11822567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of booster interventions on factory workers' use of hearing protection.
    Lusk SL; Eakin BL; Kazanis AS; McCullagh MC
    Nurs Res; 2004; 53(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 14726777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using the extended parallel process model to prevent noise-induced hearing loss among coal miners in Appalachia.
    Murray-Johnson L; Witte K; Patel D; Orrego V; Zuckerman C; Maxfield AM; Thimons ED
    Health Educ Behav; 2004 Dec; 31(6):741-55. PubMed ID: 15539545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection.
    El Dib RP; Verbeek J; Atallah AN; Andriolo RB; Soares BG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Apr; (2):CD005234. PubMed ID: 16625628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of computer-based tailoring versus targeting to promote use of hearing protection.
    Kerr MJ; Savik K; Monsen KA; Lusk SL
    Can J Nurs Res; 2007 Mar; 39(1):80-97. PubMed ID: 17450706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictors of use of hearing protection among a representative sample of farmers.
    McCullagh MC; Ronis DL; Lusk SL
    Res Nurs Health; 2010 Dec; 33(6):528-38. PubMed ID: 21053386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systematic review of the interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection.
    El Dib RP; Atallah AN; Andriolo RB; Soares BG; Verbeek J
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2007 Nov; 125(6):362-9. PubMed ID: 18317609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of knowledge and behavior toward hearing protection among workers in different workplaces and its influence factors].
    Yang M; Ou ZZ; Yang M; He P; He DK; Chen HQ; Liao XQ
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 36(6):413-415. PubMed ID: 30248733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.