These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16629006)

  • 21. [Comparison of knowledge and behavior toward hearing protection among workers in different workplaces and its influence factors].
    Yang M; Ou ZZ; Yang M; He P; He DK; Chen HQ; Liao XQ
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 36(6):413-415. PubMed ID: 30248733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The noise exposed factory workers: the prevalence of sensori-neural hearing loss and their use of personal hearing protection devices.
    Maisarah SZ; Said H
    Med J Malaysia; 1993 Sep; 48(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 8183139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Noise exposures. Effects on hearing and prevention of noise induced hearing loss.
    Lusk SL
    AAOHN J; 1997 Aug; 45(8):397-408; quiz 409-10. PubMed ID: 9341314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of the original and revised structures of the Health Promotion Model in predicting construction workers' use of hearing protection.
    Ronis DL; Hong O; Lusk SL
    Res Nurs Health; 2006 Feb; 29(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 16404731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Employment and acceptance of hearing protectors in classical symphony and opera orchestras.
    Zander MF; Spahn C; Richter B
    Noise Health; 2008; 10(38):14-26. PubMed ID: 18270404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effectiveness of an intervention to increase construction workers' use of hearing protection.
    Lusk SL; Hong OS; Ronis DL; Eakin BL; Kerr MJ; Early MR
    Hum Factors; 1999 Sep; 41(3):487-94. PubMed ID: 10665215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of a low intensity intervention to increase hearing protector use among noise-exposed workers.
    McCullagh MC
    Am J Ind Med; 2011 Mar; 54(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 20721900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Promoting Hearing Health.
    Randolph SA
    Workplace Health Saf; 2018 Aug; 66(8):412. PubMed ID: 29909742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predictors of hearing protection use for Hispanic and non-Hispanic White factory workers.
    Raymond DM; Hong O; Lusk SL; Ronis DL
    Res Theory Nurs Pract; 2006; 20(2):127-40. PubMed ID: 16758716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Noise exposure and hearing loss prevention programmes after 20 years of regulations in the United States.
    Daniell WE; Swan SS; McDaniel MM; Camp JE; Cohen MA; Stebbins JG
    Occup Environ Med; 2006 May; 63(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 16551755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Knowledge and attitudes of a group of South African mine workers towards noise induced hearing loss and the use of hearing protective devices.
    Kahan E; Ross E
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 1994; 41():37-47. PubMed ID: 8602542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Understanding barriers to preventive health actions for occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
    Patel DS; Witte K; Zuckerman C; Murray-Johnson L; Orrego V; Maxfield AM; Meadows-Hogan S; Tisdale J; Thimons ED
    J Health Commun; 2001; 6(2):155-68. PubMed ID: 11405079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Warfighter auditory situation awareness: effects of augmented hearing protection/enhancement devices and TCAPS for military ground combat applications.
    Clasing JE; Casali JG
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53 Suppl 2():S43-52. PubMed ID: 24564692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Gender and other factors associated with the use of hearing protection devices at work.
    Meira TC; Santana VS; Ferrite S
    Rev Saude Publica; 2015; 49():. PubMed ID: 26487294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An Internet-based tailored hearing protection intervention for firefighters: development process and users' feedback.
    Hong O; Eakin BL; Chin DL; Feld J; Vogel S
    Health Promot Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):572-9. PubMed ID: 23149759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predictive factors of occupational noise-induced hearing loss in Spanish workers: A prospective study.
    Pelegrin AC; Canuet L; Rodríguez ÁA; Morales MP
    Noise Health; 2015; 17(78):343-9. PubMed ID: 26356377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Determinants of use of hearing protection devices in Canadian lumber mill workers.
    Sbihi H; Teschke K; MacNab YC; Davies HW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Apr; 54(3):319-28. PubMed ID: 19570944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gender differences in use of hearing protection devices among farm operators.
    McCullagh MC; Banerjee T; Yang JJ; Bernick J; Duffy S; Redman R
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(85):368-375. PubMed ID: 27991469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Efficacy of an intervention to promote use of hearing protection devices by firefighters.
    Ewigman BG; Kivlahan CH; Hosokawa MC; Horman D
    Public Health Rep; 1990; 105(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 2106705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attitudes toward use of hearing protection devices and effects of an intervention on fit-testing results.
    Smith PS; Monaco BA; Lusk SL
    Workplace Health Saf; 2014 Dec; 62(12):491-9. PubMed ID: 25207586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.