These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16630583)

  • 1. Acoustic measurement: a tutorial for molecular biologists.
    Davis RR
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1091(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 16630583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of hearing and auditory nerve function by combining ABR, DPOAE and eABR tests into a single recording session.
    Polak M; Eshraghi AA; Nehme O; Ahsan S; Guzman J; Delgado RE; He J; Telischi FF; Balkany TJ; Van De Water TR
    J Neurosci Methods; 2004 Apr; 134(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 15003380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and tone-burst auditory brainstem responses in normal babies.
    Rance G; Tomlin D; Rickards FW
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):751-62. PubMed ID: 17086084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses.
    Mills DM
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):508-25. PubMed ID: 16957501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A comparison of auditory brainstem responses and otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening of high-risk neonates].
    Xu FL; Xing QJ; Cheng XY
    Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 10(4):460-3. PubMed ID: 18706161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory steady state response in auditory neuropathy.
    Emara AA; Gabr TA
    J Laryngol Otol; 2010 Sep; 124(9):950-6. PubMed ID: 20388244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Principal component analysis as a method to facilitate fast detection of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Ravazzani P; Tognola G; Parazzini M; Grandori F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Feb; 50(2):249-52. PubMed ID: 12665039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
    Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory efferent feedback system deficits precede age-related hearing loss: contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in mice.
    Zhu X; Vasilyeva ON; Kim S; Jacobson M; Romney J; Waterman MS; Tuttle D; Frisina RD
    J Comp Neurol; 2007 Aug; 503(5):593-604. PubMed ID: 17559088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Otoacoustic emissions and effects of contralateral white noise stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in diabetic children.
    Ugur AK; Kemaloglu YK; Ugur MB; Gunduz B; Saridogan C; Yesilkaya E; Bideci A; Cinaz P; Goksu N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 73(4):555-9. PubMed ID: 19150138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characteristic findings of auditory brainstem response and otoacoustic emission in the Bronx waltzer mouse.
    Inagaki M; Kon K; Suzuki S; Kobayashi N; Kaga M; Nanba E
    Brain Dev; 2006 Nov; 28(10):617-24. PubMed ID: 16730938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterizing the auditory changes in tumor metastasis to the bilateral internal auditory canals.
    Sone M; Katayama N; Otake N; Sato E; Fujimoto Y; Ito M; Nakashima T
    J Clin Neurosci; 2007 May; 14(5):470-3. PubMed ID: 17386369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure is responsible for variability of distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression.
    Sun XM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4310-20. PubMed ID: 18537382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physiological effects of auditory nerve myelinopathy in chinchillas.
    El-Badry MM; Ding DL; McFadden SL; Eddins AC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Mar; 25(5):1437-46. PubMed ID: 17425569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evoked otoacoustic emissions: nonlinearities and response interpretation.
    Ravazzani P; Grandori F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 May; 40(5):500-4. PubMed ID: 8225340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection and differentiation of sensorineural hearing loss in mice using auditory steady-state responses and transient auditory brainstem responses.
    Pauli-Magnus D; Hoch G; Strenzke N; Anderson S; Jentsch TJ; Moser T
    Neuroscience; 2007 Nov; 149(3):673-84. PubMed ID: 17869440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calibration of acoustic transients.
    Burkard R
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1091(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 16631624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Measurement of otoacoustic emissions by sound card].
    Du Y; Nie K; Liu J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Apr; 22(2):363-6. PubMed ID: 15884555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term administration of magnesium after acoustic trauma caused by gunshot noise in guinea pigs.
    Abaamrane L; Raffin F; Gal M; Avan P; Sendowski I
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 19084059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transient evoked otoacoustic emission input/output function and cochlear reflectivity: experiment and model.
    Sisto R; Moleti A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):2995-3008. PubMed ID: 19045787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.