These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16630738)

  • 1. [Openness on results of assisted reproductive techniques: yes, but...].
    Belaisch-Allart J
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 May; 34(5):430-1; discussion 429. PubMed ID: 16630738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Openness on results of assisted reproductive techniques: yes].
    Pouly JL
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 May; 34(5):432-3 discussion 429. PubMed ID: 16644260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Results of assisted reproductive techniques in France: are we, really, so bad?].
    Belaisch-Allart J
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Apr; 35(4):287-9. PubMed ID: 17392013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. If at first you don't succeed, try, try, try again: a successful birth after 37 cycles of assisted reproductive technology over 11 years.
    Kovacs GT; Howlett D
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):580-2. PubMed ID: 15598302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Transparency in assisted reproductive results: A necessary collaboration between clinicians and epidemiologists].
    Bouyer J; Olivennes F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Sep; 34(9):681-2. PubMed ID: 16942894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Infertility surgery is dead: only the obituary remains?
    Feinberg EC; Levens ED; DeCherney AH
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):232-6. PubMed ID: 17509579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) world report: assisted reproductive technology 2003.
    Nygren KG; Sullivan E; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; Adamson GD; de Mouzon J
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2209-22, 2222.e1-17. PubMed ID: 21536284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
    de Mouzon J; Goossens V; Bhattacharya S; Castilla JA; Ferraretti AP; Korsak V; Kupka M; Nygren KG; Nyboe Andersen A;
    Hum Reprod; 2010 Aug; 25(8):1851-62. PubMed ID: 20570973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2007 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Feb; 95(2):542-7.e1-10. PubMed ID: 20656287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Increasing success of assisted reproduction].
    Nau JY
    Rev Med Suisse; 2009 Jun; 5(207):1336. PubMed ID: 19626935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop.
    Reddy UM; Wapner RJ; Rebar RW; Tasca RJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):967-77. PubMed ID: 17400861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Assisted reproductive techniques in women aged 38 years or more].
    Lamarche C; Lévy R; Felloni B; de Mouzon J; Denis-Belicard E; Huss M; Maubon I; Aknin I; Seffert P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 May; 35(5):420-9. PubMed ID: 17459756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of the mode of assisted reproductive technology conception on obstetric outcomes for survivors of the vanishing twin syndrome.
    La Sala GB; Villani MT; Nicoli A; Gallinelli A; Nucera G; Blickstein I
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):247-9. PubMed ID: 16716323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of heterotopic and intrauterine-only pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technologies in the United States from 1999 to 2002.
    Clayton HB; Schieve LA; Peterson HB; Jamieson DJ; Reynolds MA; Wright VC
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Feb; 87(2):303-9. PubMed ID: 17113092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Outcome of assisted reproduction].
    Antoine JM
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2009 Jan; 38 Spec No 1-2():F53-7. PubMed ID: 19268225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Re: outcomes from treatment of infertility with natural procreative technology in an Irish general practice.
    Sills ES; Walsh DJ; Walsh AP
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2009; 22(1):94-5; author reply 95-6. PubMed ID: 19124642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Referral for assisted reproductive technology: indications and treatment outcome.
    Adesiyun AG
    Ann Afr Med; 2011; 10(4):316-8. PubMed ID: 22064261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recombinant human leukemia inhibitory factor does not improve implantation and pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive techniques in women with recurrent unexplained implantation failure.
    Brinsden PR; Alam V; de Moustier B; Engrand P
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Apr; 91(4 Suppl):1445-7. PubMed ID: 18710712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of obesity on assisted reproductive technology outcomes.
    Norman RJ; Chura LR; Robker RL
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jun; 89(6):1611-2. PubMed ID: 17548073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Life table (survival) analysis to generate cumulative pregnancy rates in assisted reproduction: an alternative method of calculating the cumulative pregnancy rate in assisted reproduction technology.
    Wang JX
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Jan; 21(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16155080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.