These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16631321)

  • 1. Momentary maximizing and optimal foraging theories of performance on concurrent VR schedules.
    MacDonall JS; Goodell J; Juliano A
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jun; 72(3):283-99. PubMed ID: 16631321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Some effects of overall rate of earning reinforcers on run lengths and visit durations.
    Macdonall JS
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jul; 73(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 16530983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Earning and obtaining reinforcers under concurrent interval scheduling.
    MacDonall JS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Sep; 84(2):167-83. PubMed ID: 16262185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissociation of theories of choice by temporal spacing of choice opportunities.
    Williams BA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Jul; 18(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 1619396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Synthesizing concurrent interval performances.
    MacDonall JS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Sep; 74(2):189-206. PubMed ID: 11029022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An alternative to the stay/switch equation assessed when using a changeover-delay.
    MacDonall JS
    Behav Processes; 2015 Nov; 120():40-9. PubMed ID: 26299548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Delay reduction and optimal foraging: variable-ratio search in a foraging analogue.
    Williams WA; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 May; 61(3):465-77. PubMed ID: 8207354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The generalized matching law as a predictor of choice between cocaine and food in rhesus monkeys.
    Anderson KG; Velkey AJ; Woolverton WL
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Oct; 163(3-4):319-26. PubMed ID: 12373433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Matching and maximizing with concurrent ratio-interval schedules.
    Green L; Rachlin H; Hanson J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Nov; 40(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 6655424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The stay/switch model of concurrent choice.
    MacDonall JS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Jan; 91(1):21-39. PubMed ID: 19230510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of ratio reinforcement schedules on choice behavior.
    Huang IN; Melvin JN
    J Gen Psychol; 1990 Jan; 117(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 2313283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contingency discriminability and the generalized matching law describe choice on concurrent ratio schedules of wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jul; 90(3):291-301. PubMed ID: 22414348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of upcoming food-pellet delivery on subjects' responding for 1% sucrose reinforcement delivered by concurrent random-interval schedules.
    Weatherly JN; Grove C; Beste R
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 17503690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Matching law analysis of rats' alcohol self-administration in a free-operant choice procedure.
    Jimenez-Gomez C; Shahan TA
    Behav Pharmacol; 2008 Jul; 19(4):353-6. PubMed ID: 18622184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The stay/switch model describes choice among magnitudes of reinforcers.
    MacDonall JS
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):173-84. PubMed ID: 18406545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reinforcing staying and switching while using a changeover delay.
    MacDonall JS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Mar; 79(2):219-32. PubMed ID: 12822688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preference pulses without reinforcers.
    McLean AP; Grace RC; Pitts RC; Hughes CE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):317-36. PubMed ID: 24676669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Choice behavior in spontaneously hypertensive rats: variable vs. fixed schedules of reinforcement.
    Orduña V; García A; Hong E
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):465-9. PubMed ID: 20060441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Human choice in concurrent ratio-interval schedules of reinforcement.
    Savastano HI; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 May; 61(3):453-63. PubMed ID: 8207353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are behaviors at one alternative in concurrent schedules independent of contingencies at the other alternative?
    MacDonall JS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):223-235. PubMed ID: 28805988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.