These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1663134)

  • 21. Defining research misconduct: will we know it when we see it?
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2001; 31(3):31-2. PubMed ID: 11478122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Second guessing. Is more oversight needed to curb scientific cheating?
    Beardsley T
    Sci Am; 1991 Jun; 264(6):34-5. PubMed ID: 1650032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Scientific forensics: how the Office of Research Integrity can assist institutional investigations of research misconduct during oversight review.
    Dahlberg JE; Davidian NM
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2010 Dec; 16(4):713-35. PubMed ID: 20526693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. 'Misconduct' dispute raises fears of litigation.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Jan; 385(6612):105. PubMed ID: 8990102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. What to do about scientific misconduct.
    Nature; 1994 May; 369(6478):261-2. PubMed ID: 8183349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Federal actions against plagiarism in research.
    Price AR
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 11653389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Introduction to misconduct in science and scientific duties.
    Soskolne CL
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():245-51. PubMed ID: 9857308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
    Protti M
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bill would force journals to follow misconduct rules.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 May; 357(6373):7. PubMed ID: 1315423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fraud in medical research.
    Lock S
    Issues Med Ethics; 1997; 5(4):112-4. PubMed ID: 16267905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Both accused researchers and whistle-blowers stay anonymous when no misconduct is found.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):8. PubMed ID: 16270443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Giving scientists their due. The Imanishi-Kari decision.
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 9219021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A social control perspective on scientific misconduct.
    Hackett EJ
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):242-60. PubMed ID: 11653363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Journals as policemen.
    Nature; 1992 May; 357(6373):2. PubMed ID: 1315418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Change in fraud review proposed.
    Culliton BJ
    Nature; 1992 Mar; 356(6366):191. PubMed ID: 1313150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Arizona professor files lawsuit after being fired for misconduct.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1998 Aug; 394(6696):817. PubMed ID: 9732854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fellow scientists begin to get suspicious about data.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Oct; 16(10):6-7. PubMed ID: 11833573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fraud in scientific publishing.
    Scully C; Baum B
    Oral Dis; 2006 Jul; 12(4):357. PubMed ID: 16792718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Scientific fraud.
    Loeb MR
    FASEB J; 1991 Dec; 5(15):3117. PubMed ID: 1660423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Federal agency says researcher misled colleagues and institutional administrators.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Sep; 16(9):6-7. PubMed ID: 11833568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.