BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16631641)

  • 1. Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients.
    Bakir I; Casselman FP; Wellens F; Jeanmart H; De Geest R; Degrieck I; Van Praet F; Vermeulen Y; Vanermen H
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 May; 81(5):1599-604. PubMed ID: 16631641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to standard AVR.
    Liu J; Sidiropoulos A; Konertz W
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Nov; 16 Suppl 2():S80-3. PubMed ID: 10613563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aortic valve replacement surgery: comparison of outcomes in matched sternotomy and PORT ACCESS groups.
    Brinkman WT; Hoffman W; Dewey TM; Culica D; Prince SL; Herbert MA; Mack MJ; Ryan WH
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Jul; 90(1):131-5. PubMed ID: 20609763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive reoperative isolated valve surgery: early and mid-term results.
    Sharony R; Grossi EA; Saunders PC; Schwartz CF; Ursomanno P; Ribakove GH; Galloway AC; Colvin SB
    J Card Surg; 2006; 21(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 16684050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Should minimally invasive aortic valve replacement be restricted to primary interventions?
    Bakir I; Casselman FP; De Geest R; Wellens F; Degrieck I; Van Praet F; Vermeulen Y; Vanermen H
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 55(5):304-9. PubMed ID: 17629860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is transapical aortic valve implantation really less invasive than minimally invasive aortic valve replacement?
    Zierer A; Wimmer-Greinecker G; Martens S; Moritz A; Doss M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Nov; 138(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 19740493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Propensity score analysis of a six-year experience with minimally invasive isolated aortic valve replacement.
    Sharony R; Grossi EA; Saunders PC; Schwartz CF; Ribakove GH; Baumann FG; Galloway AC; Colvin SB
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Nov; 13(6):887-93. PubMed ID: 15597578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive port access surgery reduces operative morbidity for valve replacement in the elderly.
    Grossi EA; Galloway AC; Ribakove GH; Buttenheim PM; Esposito R; Baumann FG; Colvin SB
    Heart Surg Forum; 1999; 2(3):212-5. PubMed ID: 11276477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive closed circuit versus standard extracorporeal circulation for aortic valve replacement.
    Castiglioni A; Verzini A; Pappalardo F; Colangelo N; Torracca L; Zangrillo A; Alfieri O
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Feb; 83(2):586-91. PubMed ID: 17257992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Aortic valve operations through an upper partial sternotomy].
    Kiyama H; Imazeki T; Irie Y; Katayama Y; Murai N; Sato Y; Hata I; Gon S
    Kyobu Geka; 1999 Jul; 52(7):519-24; discussion 525-7. PubMed ID: 10402777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of reoperative aortic valve replacement via right mini-thoracotomy versus median sternotomy.
    Pineda AM; Santana O; Reyna J; Sarria A; Lamas GA; Lamelas J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2013 Jan; 22(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 23610989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mitral valve replacement through a minimal right vertical infra-axillary thoracotomy versus standard median sternotomy.
    Wang D; Wang Q; Yang X; Wu Q; Li Q
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Mar; 87(3):704-8. PubMed ID: 19231374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes of minimally invasive valve surgery versus median sternotomy in patients age 75 years or greater.
    Lamelas J; Sarria A; Santana O; Pineda AM; Lamas GA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2011 Jan; 91(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 21172490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally-invasive aortic root replacement.
    Byrne JG; Adams DH; Couper GS; Rizzo RJ; Cohn LH; Aranki SF
    Heart Surg Forum; 1999; 2(4):326-9. PubMed ID: 11276495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Port-access-assisted aortic valve replacement: a comparison of minimally invasive and conventional techniques.
    Leshnower BG; Trace CS; Boova RS
    Heart Surg Forum; 2006; 9(2):E560-4; discussion E564. PubMed ID: 16431405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Port-access aortic valve surgery: a technique in evolution.
    Wheatley GH; Prince SL; Herbert MA; Ryan WH
    Heart Surg Forum; 2004; 7(6):E628-31. PubMed ID: 15769696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reoperative mitral valve surgery by the port access minithoracotomy approach is safe and effective.
    Meyer SR; Szeto WY; Augoustides JG; Morris RJ; Vernick WJ; Paschal D; Fox J; Hargrove WC
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 87(5):1426-30. PubMed ID: 19379880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic minimally invasive mitral valve reconstruction yields less blood product transfusion and shorter length of stay.
    Woo YJ; Nacke EA
    Surgery; 2006 Aug; 140(2):263-7. PubMed ID: 16904978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of minimally invasive valve surgery in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    Santana O; Reyna J; Benjo AM; Lamas GA; Lamelas J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Oct; 42(4):648-52. PubMed ID: 22555309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Aortic valve replacement through a partial sternotomy].
    Imazeki T; Irie Y
    Kyobu Geka; 2006 Jul; 59(8 Suppl):650-5. PubMed ID: 16910509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.