These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16631817)

  • 1. Genealogical theory for random mating populations with two sexes.
    Pollak E
    Math Biosci; 2006 Jul; 202(1):133-55. PubMed ID: 16631817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coalescent theory for a completely random mating monoecious population.
    Pollak E
    Math Biosci; 2007 Feb; 205(2):315-24. PubMed ID: 17011593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coalescent theory for age-structured random mating populations with two sexes.
    Pollak E
    Math Biosci; 2011 Oct; 233(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 21798273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exact Markov chains versus diffusion theory for haploid random mating.
    Tyvand PA; Thorvaldsen S
    Math Biosci; 2010 May; 225(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 20100498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An exact algebraic theory of genetic drift in finite diploid populations with random mating.
    Tyvand PA
    J Theor Biol; 1993 Aug; 163(3):315-31. PubMed ID: 8246507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Markov model of haploid random mating with given distribution of population size.
    Tyvand PA; Thorvaldsen S
    Bull Math Biol; 2006 May; 68(4):807-19. PubMed ID: 16802084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unravelling first-generation pedigrees in wild endangered salmon populations using molecular genetic markers.
    Herbinger CM; O'reilly PT; Verspoor E
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Jul; 15(8):2261-75. PubMed ID: 16780439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Analysis of genealogical structure of populations. II. The use od numerical pedigrees for calculation of inbreeding coefficient].
    Pasekov VP
    Genetika; 2000 Feb; 36(2):257-65. PubMed ID: 10752040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modelling evolutionary processes in small populations: not as ideal as you think.
    Waples RS; Faulkner JR
    Mol Ecol; 2009 May; 18(9):1834-47. PubMed ID: 19344355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When do host-parasite interactions drive the evolution of non-random mating?
    Nuismer SL; Otto SP; Blanquart F
    Ecol Lett; 2008 Sep; 11(9):937-46. PubMed ID: 18522642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of individual increase in inbreeding to estimate realized effective sizes from real pedigrees.
    Cervantes I; Goyache F; Molina A; Valera M; Gutiérrez JP
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2008 Oct; 125(5):301-10. PubMed ID: 18803785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inbreeding avoidance under different null models of random mating in the great tit.
    Szulkin M; Zelazowski P; Nicholson G; Sheldon BC
    J Anim Ecol; 2009 Jul; 78(4):778-88. PubMed ID: 19383076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving the estimation of realized effective population sizes in farm animals.
    Gutiérrez JP; Cervantes I; Goyache F
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Aug; 126(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 19630884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effective size of fluctuating populations.
    Iizuka M
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Jun; 59(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 11560448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic variability in Colombian Creole cattle populations estimated by pedigree information.
    Martínez RA; García D; Gallego JL; Onofre G; Pérez J; Cañón J
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(3):545-52. PubMed ID: 18073285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the theory of partially inbreeding finite populations. IV. The effective population size for polyploids reproducing by partial selfing.
    Pollak E; Sabran M
    Math Biosci; 1996 Jul; 135(1):69-84. PubMed ID: 8688566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A model for the evolution of assortative mating.
    de Cara MA; Barton NH; Kirkpatrick M
    Am Nat; 2008 May; 171(5):580-96. PubMed ID: 18419568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pedigrees and microsatellites among endangered ungulates: what do they tell us?
    Ruiz-López MJ; Roldán ER; Espeso G; Gomendio M
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Apr; 18(7):1352-64. PubMed ID: 19368643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does organismal pedigree impact the magnitude of topological congruence among gene trees for unlinked loci?
    Kuo CH; Avise JC
    Genetica; 2008 Mar; 132(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 17636429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interpopulation variation in mating system and late-stage inbreeding depression in Magnolia stellata.
    Tamaki I; Ishida K; Setsuko S; Tomaru N
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Jun; 18(11):2365-74. PubMed ID: 19457207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.