These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

599 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16631836)

  • 41. Light-cured calcium hydroxide vs formocresol in human primary molar pulpotomies: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zurn D; Seale NS
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 18402097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Current pulp therapy options for primary teeth.
    Blanchard S; Boynton J
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 2010 Jan; 92(1):38, 40-1. PubMed ID: 20131727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Equivalency study of histological responses to complete or partial pulpotomies in inflamed baboon immature first permanent molars.
    Cleaton-Jones P; Duggal M; Parak R; Williams S; Setzer S
    SADJ; 2007 Mar; 62(2):062-5. PubMed ID: 17624175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Formocresol and Chloramphenicol, Tetracycline and Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Antibiotic Paste in Primary Teeth Pulpotomies: 24 month follow up.
    Luengo-Fereira J; Ayala-Jiménez S; Carlos-Medrano LE; Toscano-García I; Anaya-Álvarez M
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 43(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 30289365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Stainless steel crown and pulpotomy: procedure and technique for primary molars.
    Soxman JA
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 11199595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A retrospective study of a modified 1-minute formocresol pulpotomy technique part 1: clinical and radiographic findings.
    Kurji ZA; Sigal MJ; Andrews P; Titley K
    Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 21703062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evidence-based assessment: evaluation of the formocresol versus ferric sulfate primary molar pulpotomy.
    Loh A; O'Hoy P; Tran X; Charles R; Hughes A; Kubo K; Messer LB
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(5):401-9. PubMed ID: 15460294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Current concepts in vital pulpotomies in primary teeth.
    Castro A
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 2005 Jan; 87(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 15714830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Pulpal therapy for primary teeth: formocresol vs electrosurgery: a clinical study.
    Rivera N; Reyes E; Mazzaoui S; Morón A
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):71-3. PubMed ID: 12762614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Alternative method of hemorrhage control in full strength formocresol pulpotomy.
    Thompson KS; Seale NS; Nunn ME; Huff G
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 11447951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Histological evaluation of electrosurgery and formocresol pulpotomy techniques in primary teeth in dogs.
    El-Meligy O; Abdalla M; El-Baraway S; El-Tekya M; Dean JA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 26(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 11688819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Vital pulp therapy with new materials for primary teeth: new directions and Treatment perspectives.
    Fuks AB
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 18615986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Vital pulp therapy with new materials for primary teeth: new directions and treatment perspectives.
    Fuks AB
    J Endod; 2008 Jul; 34(7 Suppl):S18-24. PubMed ID: 18565366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Diffusion of buffered glutaraldehyde and formocresol from pulpotomized primary teeth.
    Rusmah M; Rahim ZH
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1992; 59(2):108-10. PubMed ID: 1583191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison between biodentine and formocresol for pulpotomy of primary teeth: A randomized clinical trial.
    El Meligy OA; Allazzam S; Alamoudi NM
    Quintessence Int; 2016; 47(7):571-80. PubMed ID: 27175451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A comparison of two liner materials for use in the ferric sulfate pulpotomy.
    Mohamed N
    SADJ; 2008 Jul; 63(6):338, 340-2. PubMed ID: 18811097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [A 24 month evaluation of zinc oxide pulpotomy on primary canines].
    Chédid JC; Pilipili C
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 18717454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effectiveness of 4 pulpotomy techniques--randomized controlled trial.
    Huth KC; Paschos E; Hajek-Al-Khatar N; Hollweck R; Crispin A; Hickel R; Folwaczny M
    J Dent Res; 2005 Dec; 84(12):1144-8. PubMed ID: 16304444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Retrospective record review: reinforced zinc oxide-eugenol pulpotomy: a retrospective study.
    Hui-Derksen EK; Chen CF; Majewski R; Tootla RG; Boynton JR
    Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 23635897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpotomies in primary molars with formocresol, glutaraldehyde and ferric sulphate.
    Havale R; Anegundi RT; Indushekar K; Sudha P
    Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 23474578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.