416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16631985)
1. Prospective validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with serious outcomes.
Quinn J; McDermott D; Stiell I; Kohn M; Wells G
Ann Emerg Med; 2006 May; 47(5):448-54. PubMed ID: 16631985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. External validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule.
Sun BC; Mangione CM; Merchant G; Weiss T; Shlamovitz GZ; Zargaraff G; Shiraga S; Hoffman JR; Mower WR
Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Apr; 49(4):420-7, 427.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17210201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Failure to validate the San Francisco Syncope Rule in an independent emergency department population.
Birnbaum A; Esses D; Bijur P; Wollowitz A; Gallagher EJ
Ann Emerg Med; 2008 Aug; 52(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 18282636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The San Francisco Syncope Rule vs physician judgment and decision making.
Quinn JV; Stiell IG; McDermott DA; Kohn MA; Wells GA
Am J Emerg Med; 2005 Oct; 23(6):782-6. PubMed ID: 16182988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Risk stratification Of Syncope in the Emergency department (ROSE) pilot study: a comparison of existing syncope guidelines.
Reed MJ; Newby DE; Coull AJ; Jacques KG; Prescott RJ; Gray AJ
Emerg Med J; 2007 Apr; 24(4):270-5. PubMed ID: 17384381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of San Francisco Syncope Rule in elderly ED patients.
Schladenhaufen R; Feilinger S; Pollack M; Benenson R; Kusmiesz AL
Am J Emerg Med; 2008 Sep; 26(7):773-8. PubMed ID: 18774041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Derivation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with short-term serious outcomes.
Quinn JV; Stiell IG; McDermott DA; Sellers KL; Kohn MA; Wells GA
Ann Emerg Med; 2004 Feb; 43(2):224-32. PubMed ID: 14747812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrocardiogram findings in emergency department patients with syncope.
Quinn J; McDermott D
Acad Emerg Med; 2011 Jul; 18(7):714-8. PubMed ID: 21762234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Death after emergency department visits for syncope: how common and can it be predicted?
Quinn J; McDermott D; Kramer N; Yeh C; Kohn MA; Stiell I; Wells G
Ann Emerg Med; 2008 May; 51(5):585-90. PubMed ID: 17889403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule: will it change practice?
Miller CD; Hoekstra JW
Ann Emerg Med; 2006 May; 47(5):455-6. PubMed ID: 16631986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. San Francisco Syncope Rule, Osservatorio Epidemiologico sulla Sincope nel Lazio risk score, and clinical judgment in the assessment of short-term outcome of syncope.
Dipaola F; Costantino G; Perego F; Borella M; Galli A; Cantoni G; Barbic F; Casella F; Duca PG; Furlan R;
Am J Emerg Med; 2010 May; 28(4):432-9. PubMed ID: 20466221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Defining abnormal electrocardiography in adult emergency department syncope patients: the Ottawa Electrocardiographic Criteria.
Thiruganasambandamoorthy V; Hess EP; Turko E; Tran ML; Wells GA; Stiell IG
CJEM; 2012 Jul; 14(4):248-58. PubMed ID: 22813399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Triage of patients for a rapid (5-minute) electrocardiogram: A rule based on presenting chief complaints.
Graff L; Palmer AC; Lamonica P; Wolf S
Ann Emerg Med; 2000 Dec; 36(6):554-60. PubMed ID: 11097694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule in two hospital emergency departments in an Asian population.
Tan C; Sim TB; Thng SY
Acad Emerg Med; 2013 May; 20(5):487-97. PubMed ID: 23672363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A clinical decision rule to identify which chest pain patients can safely be removed from cardiac monitoring in the emergency department.
Gatien M; Perry JJ; Stiell IG; Wielgosz A; Lee JS
Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Aug; 50(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 17498844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective validation of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score in the emergency department chest pain population.
Chase M; Robey JL; Zogby KE; Sease KL; Shofer FS; Hollander JE
Ann Emerg Med; 2006 Sep; 48(3):252-9. PubMed ID: 16934646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low diagnostic yield of electrocardiogram testing in younger patients with syncope.
Sun BC; Hoffman JR; Mower WR; Shlamovitz GZ; Gabayan GZ; Mangione CM
Ann Emerg Med; 2008 Mar; 51(3):240-6, 246.e1. PubMed ID: 17559972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The San Francisco Syncope Rule performs well in a regional rural emergency department in New Zealand.
Munro A; Whittaker R
N Z Med J; 2013 May; 126(1374):29-33. PubMed ID: 23799380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Usefulness of syncope guidelines in risk stratification of syncope in emergency department.
Sruamsiri K; Chenthanakij B; Tantiwut A; Wittayachamnankul B
J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Feb; 97(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 24765895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relative utility of serum troponin and the OESIL score in syncope.
Hing R; Harris R
Emerg Med Australas; 2005 Feb; 17(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 15675902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
