650 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16632187)
1. Is pelvic lymph node dissection necessary in patients with a serum PSA<10ng/ml undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer?
Schumacher MC; Burkhard FC; Thalmann GN; Fleischmann A; Studer UE
Eur Urol; 2006 Aug; 50(2):272-9. PubMed ID: 16632187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis.
Heidenreich A; Varga Z; Von Knobloch R
J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1681-6. PubMed ID: 11912387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Good outcome for patients with few lymph node metastases after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Schumacher MC; Burkhard FC; Thalmann GN; Fleischmann A; Studer UE
Eur Urol; 2008 Aug; 54(2):344-52. PubMed ID: 18511183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidence of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of < or =10 ng/mL and biopsy Gleason score of < or =6, and their influence on PSA progression-free survival after radical prostatectomy.
Weckermann D; Goppelt M; Dorn R; Wawroschek F; Harzmann R
BJU Int; 2006 Jun; 97(6):1173-8. PubMed ID: 16686707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of robotic surgery on pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: the Brown University early robotic experience.
Yates J; Haleblian G; Stein B; Miller B; Renzulli J; Pareek G
Can J Urol; 2009 Oct; 16(5):4842-6. PubMed ID: 19796462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of surgical volume on the rate of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Briganti A; Capitanio U; Chun FK; Gallina A; Suardi N; Salonia A; Da Pozzo LF; Colombo R; Di Girolamo V; Bertini R; Guazzoni G; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Rigatti P
Eur Urol; 2008 Oct; 54(4):794-802. PubMed ID: 18514383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The extent of lymphadenectomy for pTXNO prostate cancer does not affect prostate cancer outcome in the prostate specific antigen era.
DiMarco DS; Zincke H; Sebo TJ; Slezak J; Bergstralh EJ; Blute ML
J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1121-5. PubMed ID: 15758719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion based on the extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.
Briganti A; Chun FK; Salonia A; Gallina A; Farina E; Da Pozzo LF; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
BJU Int; 2006 Oct; 98(4):788-93. PubMed ID: 16796698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for high-risk prostate cancer.
Wyler SF; Sulser T; Seifert HH; Ruszat R; Forster TH; Gasser TC; Bachmann A
Urology; 2006 Oct; 68(4):883-7. PubMed ID: 17070376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detecting lymph nodes metastasis in prostate cancer through extended vs. standard laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Arenas LF; Füllhase C; Boemans P; Fichtner J
Aktuelle Urol; 2010 Jan; 41 Suppl 1():S10-4. PubMed ID: 20094944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. No difference in six-year biochemical failure rates with or without pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in low-risk patients with localized prostate cancer.
Bhatta-Dhar N; Reuther AM; Zippe C; Klein EA
Urology; 2004 Mar; 63(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 15028451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Open pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: a reassessment.
Campbell SC; Klein EA; Levin HS; Piedmonte MR
Urology; 1995 Sep; 46(3):352-5. PubMed ID: 7544933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Significance of micrometastases in pelvic lymph nodes detected by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy.
Miyake H; Kurahashi T; Hara I; Takenaka A; Fujisawa M
BJU Int; 2007 Feb; 99(2):315-20. PubMed ID: 17155986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: description of the surgical technique and initial results.
Lattouf JB; Beri A; Jeschke S; Sega W; Leeb K; Janetschek G
Eur Urol; 2007 Nov; 52(5):1347-55. PubMed ID: 17507150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sentinel lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: experience with more than 1,000 patients.
Weckermann D; Dorn R; Trefz M; Wagner T; Wawroschek F; Harzmann R
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):916-20. PubMed ID: 17296375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radioisotope guided sentinel lymph node dissection in patients with localized prostate cancer: results of the first 100 cases.
Bastide C; Brenot-Rossi I; Garcia S; Rossi D
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jul; 35(7):751-6. PubMed ID: 18538526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer.
Cagiannos I; Karakiewicz P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Rabbani F; Gerigk C; Reuter V; Graefen M; Hammerer PG; Erbersdobler A; Huland H; Kupelian P; Klein E; Quinn DI; Henshall SM; Grygiel JJ; Sutherland RL; Stricker PD; Morash CG; Scardino PT; Kattan MW
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1798-803. PubMed ID: 14532779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in the staging of prostate cancer.
Stone NN; Stock RG
Mt Sinai J Med; 1999 Jan; 66(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 9989102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is a limited lymphadenectomy targeting obturator nodes alone an adequate procedure for Japanese men undergoing radical prostatectomy?
Miyake H; Sakai I; Harada K; Hara I; Eto H
Int J Urol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):739-44. PubMed ID: 16174048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era.
Boorjian SA; Thompson RH; Siddiqui S; Bagniewski S; Bergstralh EJ; Karnes RJ; Frank I; Blute ML
J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):864-70; discussion 870-1. PubMed ID: 17631342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
