225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16632213)
41. Survival analysis and clinicopathological factors associated with false-negative sentinel lymph node biopsy findings in patients with cutaneous melanoma.
Nowecki ZI; Rutkowski P; Nasierowska-Guttmejer A; Ruka W
Ann Surg Oncol; 2006 Dec; 13(12):1655-63. PubMed ID: 17016755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Prognostic significance of extent of ulceration in primary cutaneous melanoma.
Grande Sarpa H; Reinke K; Shaikh L; Leong SP; Miller JR; Sagebiel RW; Kashani-Sabet M
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Nov; 30(11):1396-400. PubMed ID: 17063079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Pathology of melanoma.
Elder DE
Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Apr; 12(7 Pt 2):2308s-2311s. PubMed ID: 16609050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predict sentinel lymph node positivity in patients with cutaneous melanoma.
Taylor RC; Patel A; Panageas KS; Busam KJ; Brady MS
J Clin Oncol; 2007 Mar; 25(7):869-75. PubMed ID: 17327608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The prognostic significance of isolated immunohistochemically positive cells in sentinel lymph nodes of melanoma patients.
Murali R; Thompson JF; Shaw HM; Scolyer RA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Jul; 32(7):1106-7; author reply 1107-8. PubMed ID: 18521043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Tumor lymphangiogenesis and melanoma metastasis.
Rinderknecht M; Detmar M
J Cell Physiol; 2008 Aug; 216(2):347-54. PubMed ID: 18481261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Sentinel node tumor burden according to the Rotterdam criteria is the most important prognostic factor for survival in melanoma patients: a multicenter study in 388 patients with positive sentinel nodes.
van Akkooi AC; Nowecki ZI; Voit C; Schäfer-Hesterberg G; Michej W; de Wilt JH; Rutkowski P; Verhoef C; Eggermont AM
Ann Surg; 2008 Dec; 248(6):949-55. PubMed ID: 19092339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the preoperative evaluation of melanoma patients eligible for sentinel node biopsy.
van Rijk MC; Teertstra HJ; Peterse JL; Nieweg OE; Olmos RA; Hoefnagel CA; Kroon BB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2006 Nov; 13(11):1511-6. PubMed ID: 17009151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The prognostic importance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in thin melanoma.
Ranieri JM; Wagner JD; Wenck S; Johnson CS; Coleman JJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):927-32. PubMed ID: 16788753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging staging before completion lymphadenectomy in patients with sentinel lymph node-positive melanoma.
Aloia TA; Gershenwald JE; Andtbacka RH; Johnson MM; Schacherer CW; Ng CS; Cormier JN; Lee JE; Ross MI; Mansfield PF
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Jun; 24(18):2858-65. PubMed ID: 16782925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous melanoma: outcome after 5-years follow-up.
Cuchet E; Pinel N; Corcella D; Vuillez JP; Lebeau J; Moutet F; Colonna M; Leccia MT
Eur J Dermatol; 2007; 17(5):387-91. PubMed ID: 17673381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Clinical significance of the RT-PCR positive sentinel node in melanoma.
Temple CL; Snell LJ; Power SM; Parfitt JR; Scilley C; Engel CJ; Shum D; Chakrabarti S; Joseph MG; Lohmann RC; Ainsworth P
J Surg Oncol; 2007 Jun; 95(7):546-54. PubMed ID: 17219388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Optimal detection of sentinel lymph node metastases by intraoperative radioactive threshold and molecular analysis in patients with melanoma.
Manca G; Romanini A; Pellegrino D; Borsò E; Rondini M; Orlandini C; Zucchi V; Pasqualetti F; Mariani G
J Nucl Med; 2008 Nov; 49(11):1769-75. PubMed ID: 18927334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Melanoma in the young: differences and similarities with adult melanoma: a case-matched controlled analysis.
Livestro DP; Kaine EM; Michaelson JS; Mihm MC; Haluska FG; Muzikansky A; Sober AJ; Tanabe KK
Cancer; 2007 Aug; 110(3):614-24. PubMed ID: 17577228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Sentinel lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor for thick (> or = 4 mm) melanomas.
Gutzmer R; Satzger I; Thoms KM; Völker B; Mitteldorf C; Kapp A; Bertsch HP; Kretschmer L
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2008 Mar; 6(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 18093216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Our experience of melanoma thickness as a predictor of outcome of sentinel node biopsy.
Homolak D; Vucetić B; Puljiz Z; Blajć I; Vurnek Zivković M; Situm M
Coll Antropol; 2008 Oct; 32 Suppl 2():57-60. PubMed ID: 19138008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Prognostic significance of histopathological parameters in sentinel nodes of melanoma patients.
Satzger I; Völker B; Al Ghazal M; Meier A; Kapp A; Gutzmer R
Histopathology; 2007 May; 50(6):764-72. PubMed ID: 17493240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Inguinal node dissection for melanoma in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Sabel MS; Griffith KA; Arora A; Shargorodsky J; Blazer DG; Rees R; Wong SL; Cimmino VM; Chang AE
Surgery; 2007 Jun; 141(6):728-35. PubMed ID: 17560249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Malignant melanoma -- a medical students' viewpoint].
Felcht M; Fischer JC; Michels M; Weinhold M; Zouboulis CC
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2005 Jun; 3(6):421-30. PubMed ID: 15892844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The role of sentinel node biopsy in patients with cutaneous melanoma.
Aldredge LM
Nurs Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 42(3):379-92, v-vi. PubMed ID: 17825660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
